I received this article via email from the Walking Horse Report. I'm not a member, but I received the information anyway. I'm glad they sent it to me. My thoughts on this decision are below the article.
-------------------------
NHSC Votes To Dissolve
Copyright 2009 WHR
By Jeffrey Howard
SHELBYVILLE, Tenn. – The National Horse Show Commission (NHSC) Board of Directors unanimously voted today to dissolve the NHSC and turn over the assets of the NHSC to SHOW, the Horse Industry Organization (HIO) of The Celebration, Inc. The NHSC board consists of Chairman Link Webb, David Landrum, Steve Hankins and Jamie Hankins from the Walking Horse Trainers’ Association (WHTA). Representing the Walking Horse Owners’ Association (WHOA) are Frank Neal, David Pruett, Mark Farrar and Bob Medina.
The meeting began with Medina participating via a conference call. There was a question raised regarding his physical presence being required to vote. After a brief discussion and review of the bylaws, it was determined that Medina would be allowed to participate via conference call and cast his vote. Alternates were on hand and would have been able to sit in his place
Several questions were raised by Farrar including the timeline for the transfer to take place, the status of contracts, the status of suspensions and how to dissolve a corporation in Tennessee. Per the contract question, all horse shows that have affiliated with the NHSC will still be affiliated and after the transfer will become affiliated with the SHOW HIO. Those horse shows that would like to change affiliations will be allowed to do so.
Also, the contract with the Kentucky HIO that allows the sharing of judges of both the NHSC and Kentucky HIO will have to be renegotiated by SHOW. Landrum informed the board that the Kentucky HIO is willing to continue this agreement with the new HIO.
After the parameters were established the new business came to the floor and the members of the NHSC had a very intense discussion. “We need to make sure we do this correct. We have been here a long time and we need to be careful how we do this,” said Landrum. “The NHSC has been here a long time and done its job,” said Webb. “However it is time for this industry to make a change,” concluded Webb.
Steve Hankins joined in, “It is very important that we have lots of communication with the new HIO so that WHTA and WHOA are kept informed of the progress.”
There has been some confusion on the dissolution of the NHSC before SHOW has agreed to assume the responsibilities of the NHSC. “It is my understanding that SHOW will not vote on this until all of our groups (WHOA, WHTA and NHSC) have decided this is what we want,” said Webb.
“There is no assurance to this day that SHOW will agree to do this,” said Neal. The Celebration board has met once in an information session and has also participated in some capacity on the WHOA conference calls and meetings. It is assumed in the industry that SHOW will begin work immediately to activate its HIO and be affiliating horse shows as soon as possible.
Medina made one last plea to the board to keep the judging and rule book under “NHSC (B)” and allow the functions of the HIO and compliance to move to SHOW. This idea was rejected by the other members of the board that felt it was best SHOW assume all responsibilities. “We either need to do it all or none,” said Webb.
The next topic was that of the monies and how they would be distributed after dissolution. The NHSC has a checking account with $71,118 and a CD with $40,000. Neal and the others felt that monies contributed by WHOA and WHTA should be returned to those respective groups. All affiliation fees should be transferred to SHOW. Year-to-date 73 horse shows and sales have affiliated with the NHSC.
The NHSC board felt that a $5,000 amount should also be transferred to SHOW as seed money in addition to all affiliation fees. Past due amounts from 2007 and 2008 will become the property of WHOA and WHTA once they are collected. The past due amounts from these years totals almost $30,000.
Kim Bennett raised the question of assets loaned to the NHSC and whether they would be transferred to SHOW. It was agreed that no assets not owned by the NHSC could be transferred. Bennett also asked about show records. “It is my assumption that the show records would go to SHOW,” concluded Webb.
A short recess was taken and upon the return of the members the final motion was made to dissolve the NHSC by Medina and seconded by Landrum. It read as follows:
“I make a motion to dissolve the NHSC effective on a date specified by Dr. Meadows in a notice to WHOA President Frank Neal and WHTA President Link Webb.
I further move that all employees of the NHSC become the employees of SHOW at the same salary and benefits effective on the same date of Dr. Meadows’ notification.
I further move that all records, equipment and all other assets and supplies of the NHSC other than the excess cash over amounts paid by future show affiliations less $5,000, other than all accounts receivable arising from shows already completed become the property of SHOW for a payment of $1 by SHOW on the same date of Dr. Meadows’ notification.
I further move that all liabilities of the NHSC including the lease on its office be assumed on the effective date of Dr. Meadows’ notification.
I further move that all contracts arising out of any show affiliations will be assumed and honored by SHOW effective on the date of Dr. Meadows’ notification. And until the notification date, the NHSC will perform all the necessary duties to all shows that affiliated with the NHSC.
I move that upon dissolution of the NHSC that any funds remaining in the NHSC be divided 50/50 between the WHT and WHOA.”
The vote was taken by roll call and all eight members voted in favor of the motion. “This is tough to give up. I have been here a long time and remember the days in the basement. We probably need a prayer session that we have done the right thing, but I think we have,” said Landrum. He continued, “We don’t need more HIOs, we need to pull together and take a new direction. If you think this business isn’t hurting, then you aren’t in the same position I am. We are shrinking in credibility and market share and I can promise you that whether this is right or not, the intent is to do the right thing. This can make WHOA, WHTA and TWHBEA stronger organizations. We can all focus on what we do best.”
Neal gave his summary as well. “I’ve always thought the NHSC was doing a good job. It’s had its faults over the years as will the new one (HIO). This isn’t my livelihood but it is scary to me to think how this has been done without everyone sitting at a table and hashing it out. However the makeup of the WHOA board is a lot of your (Trainers) customers and this is what we have voted to do. When the board votes 19-6, I have to vote the wishes of the board. I hope it is the right thing because if it is not, this could be the beginning of the end for the padded horse. You have given up a lot, almost everything and I hope you will be able to live with it. Anything I can do to make it work better, I am happy to do it,” said Neal.
Webb joined in, “There are no guarantees. At this point the industry is not going anywhere for whatever reason. Every day for the last two years I have heard the same thing, the trainers need to get out of the compliance of the industry. I think we are making the right decision and taking a hell of a step. We took a hell of step in the 1970s when we started checking the horses and today we make this step to help the industry strive more. If we will stand together as WHOA and WHTA it will make us stronger.”
A historic day is upon us and the industry will enter into another phase of its long and successful history. The Tennessee Walking Horse is one of the greatest breeds in the world and today’s vote is taken in an attempt to gain the attention and credibility this horse deserves. As many stated in the meeting, there are no guarantees and this signals only the beginning, but therein lies the key phrase; this is the beginning.
The industry finds itself at a crossroads and the trainers and owners have made some very difficult decisions they feel will position the industry to move forward. This next transition period may be difficult, but decisions such as today’s are best made for the long-term success of the breed.
The Tennessee Walking Horse National Celebration will now vote to decide its course of action as well as the timeline for the transfer. It is assumed that the Celebration will vote to take on the task of activating its HIO, implement an independent oversight board and move the transition along as quickly as possible.
------------------------
What I see here is that they're only switching the HIO as to where the rulebook is going to be governed. I don't see this making a big difference in the long run. We know that the WHTA is full of those who continue to sore their horses and support those who sore, so they are going to do things just to try to make themselves look better. I agree that there need to be less HIOs, and dissolving the NHSC is a good move. But I don't believe that the move is being made to help the horse. It's being made to make WHTA look good on the surface, but it's just another ploy to further their insane need to continue to abuse animals for profit.
I also understand that WHOA was originally founded to help eliminate the sore horse. However, the sore horse industry bullied WHOA into allowing sore horses in with their usual money bribes. WHOA is not it's own entity anymore--it is really run by those who are corrupt within the industry, just another group that's been bullied and cannonized. Neal said in his quote that WHOA is made up of the WHTA's customers, so of course they're going to do what makes them money and keeps things status quo.
I agree with what many people have said in response to this news: put the rulebook with the breed registry like all other breed registries do and dissolve all HIOs that support the Big Lick and carry their own rulebooks. This decision is not a step in any direction, backwards or forwards, just a continued move in the fight to keep the sore horse in the ring. May the USDA see right through these jerks and be out in force at WHOA and SHOW affilated shows.
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Friday, March 13, 2009
ARTICLE and NEWS - LET THE HORSES TALK: USDA draws a line in the sand
I hadn't posted this information yet because I had only heard about it through speculations. Now the info has been released to the public and we're seeing some real progress.
The USDA is out in force and working hard, and perhaps something is going to break free. Let's hope it's the horses and that they break free of the chains and contraptions that are ruining this breed. There seems to be a light at the end of this very black and bleak tunnel.
Marshall County Tribune: Story:
Let the horses talk: USDA draws a line in the sand
Friday, March 13, 2009 - By Tom Sumners - www.marshalltribune.com
In what could be a pivotal year for the Tennessee Walking Horse industry, optimism could turn to pessimism. The United States Department of Agriculture has implemented changes in the way the Horse Protection Act will be enforced for the 2009 season. Several meetings have been held since the first of the year to explain the changes.
One of the most notable changes is that no saddle or tail brace may be on the horse when coming to the inspection area. Horses may be subject to looking into their mouths and under their tails for foreign objects or distractions. The inspectors (Veterinary Medical Officers or VMOs) will also have the authority to have shoes pulled for further diagnosis when a farrier is available, and hoof testers may be used on flat-shod and padded horses. Also, there will be inspections of the warm-up ring, barns, horse trailers, and so forth.
The National Horse Show Commission inspectors (Designated Qualified Persons or DQPs) will not be permitted to inspect a horse owned by a member of the DQP's immediate family or owned by a DQP's employer.
The VMO and DQP inspectors will always be allowed to carry out their duties with limitations. An area of contention for several years has been the interpretation of the scar rule. Another clinic is to be held in the near future to discuss this in more detail.
With this being said, the Walking Horse Trainers' Association (WHTA) Board of Directors has recommended that the National Horse Show Commission (NHSC) be removed as its Horse Industry Organization (HIO) and ask the Tennessee Walking Horse National Celebration to implement their HIO, which is called SHOW, to assume the NHSC's function.
This decision was made after two days of meetings focusing on the best strategy to move the walking horse industry forward. The Celebration will take this under advisement. The NHSC is made up of an eight-person board consisting of four WHTA representatives and four from the Walking Horse Owners Association (WHOA). A special called meeting of the membership of the WHTA was held on Monday, March 9, and approved the board's recommendation to leave the NHSC. In so doing, the WHTA board of directors voted to reschedule the upcoming Trainers' show at a later date.
There will be a transition period to get the new HIO operational. This will make a more independent HIO and remove the stigma of conflicts of interest that has existed for many years. Evidently, the USDA has not been pleased with self-enforcement of the industry. With that said and done, the USDA has drawn a line in the sand to let everyone know enforcement of the Horse Protection Act will take place and that the welfare of the horse is first and foremost on their agenda. LET THE HORSES TALK
The USDA is out in force and working hard, and perhaps something is going to break free. Let's hope it's the horses and that they break free of the chains and contraptions that are ruining this breed. There seems to be a light at the end of this very black and bleak tunnel.
**********
Marshall County Tribune: Story:
Let the horses talk: USDA draws a line in the sand
Friday, March 13, 2009 - By Tom Sumners - www.marshalltribune.com
In what could be a pivotal year for the Tennessee Walking Horse industry, optimism could turn to pessimism. The United States Department of Agriculture has implemented changes in the way the Horse Protection Act will be enforced for the 2009 season. Several meetings have been held since the first of the year to explain the changes.
One of the most notable changes is that no saddle or tail brace may be on the horse when coming to the inspection area. Horses may be subject to looking into their mouths and under their tails for foreign objects or distractions. The inspectors (Veterinary Medical Officers or VMOs) will also have the authority to have shoes pulled for further diagnosis when a farrier is available, and hoof testers may be used on flat-shod and padded horses. Also, there will be inspections of the warm-up ring, barns, horse trailers, and so forth.
The National Horse Show Commission inspectors (Designated Qualified Persons or DQPs) will not be permitted to inspect a horse owned by a member of the DQP's immediate family or owned by a DQP's employer.
The VMO and DQP inspectors will always be allowed to carry out their duties with limitations. An area of contention for several years has been the interpretation of the scar rule. Another clinic is to be held in the near future to discuss this in more detail.
With this being said, the Walking Horse Trainers' Association (WHTA) Board of Directors has recommended that the National Horse Show Commission (NHSC) be removed as its Horse Industry Organization (HIO) and ask the Tennessee Walking Horse National Celebration to implement their HIO, which is called SHOW, to assume the NHSC's function.
This decision was made after two days of meetings focusing on the best strategy to move the walking horse industry forward. The Celebration will take this under advisement. The NHSC is made up of an eight-person board consisting of four WHTA representatives and four from the Walking Horse Owners Association (WHOA). A special called meeting of the membership of the WHTA was held on Monday, March 9, and approved the board's recommendation to leave the NHSC. In so doing, the WHTA board of directors voted to reschedule the upcoming Trainers' show at a later date.
There will be a transition period to get the new HIO operational. This will make a more independent HIO and remove the stigma of conflicts of interest that has existed for many years. Evidently, the USDA has not been pleased with self-enforcement of the industry. With that said and done, the USDA has drawn a line in the sand to let everyone know enforcement of the Horse Protection Act will take place and that the welfare of the horse is first and foremost on their agenda. LET THE HORSES TALK
Monday, March 2, 2009
HOW YOU CAN HELP - Writing Letters, Part 3: Sample Letter with Edits
My previous two posts about Writing Letters have covered word use and basic formatting requirements. The following is the letter that actually spawned this three-part post. A friend recently sent the following letter she'd written to the judge who was in charge of the Cleve Wells case in Texas. She wanted to express her opinion as a horse trainer and buisness owner as to why Wells should have been prosecuted. She sent it to a bunch of friends for critique. Of course, being the English-use and correct format freak that I am, I sent some suggestions back to her. She let me post her letter here to help show how a letter can be changed to be more effective and more apt to be taken seriously.
My friend's letter is in blue text; my comments are in red text.
To the office of
District Attorney
Honorable Dale Hanna
Phone (817) 556-6802
Fax (817) 556-6816
Guinn Justice Center
204 S. Buffalo Ave Room 209
Cleburne, Texas 76033
Re: SLOW LOPIN SCOTCH It would probably be better if your reason for the letter was Cleve Wells, or the actual case number, if you can find it. They most likely won't remember the horse's name (unfortunately).
It has recently come to my attention that the district attorneys office has chosen a discretionary rejection concerning the case against Mr. Cleve Wells for his role in the abuse of a horse under his care named Slow Lopin Scotch.
All I can do is shake my head in amazement and wonder why and how this ever could have happened? use a period here instead of a ? It has been stated that your office has received a large amount of correspondence concerning Mr. Wells and his abusive habits which he calls horse training. I should also hope you have read a good number of first hand accounts of the actions of Mr. Wells. I can assure you that there is absolutely NO reason on earth a horse should suffer the injuries to the extent of those displayed in the pictures of Slow Lopin Scotch, nor the sheer torture he surely endured. NONE whatsoever! Delete this last sentence. Dramatic language such as this is ignored and it can reflect bad on you. Take out all capital letter words as well.
From what I understand the discretionary rejection was chosen due in part to many of the occurrences you learned of, happening outside of your jurisdiction. If this is true, did you not consider that this ONE case is YOUR chance to STOP someone who obviously has no regard for animals? Turn this into a sentence rather than a question. This is a very derogatory question toward the DA--if I were him, I'd drop your letter right now and not read the rest. You want to approach him with facts, not be accusatory. Accusations only piss people off. If the other occurrences happened in places outside of your jurisdiction, that should tell you in no uncertain terms, Mr. Wells behaves in this same ruthless, uncaring and callous manner while he is away at horse shows and most likely while IN the public eye. If he behaves this badly and is this abusive to animals in public, there is no telling what happens to them at ‘home’ on his property and behind his barn doors.
It has also been stated that Mr. Wells claims one of his employees is at fault for the injuries suffered by Slow Lopin Scotch. Again, let me assure you, take "let me assure you" out--another accusatory statement, as if you know more than him. Okay, of course you do, but you don't want to question his job as the DA. whether the injuries came from the abusive hands of Mr. Wells or one of his employees, the horse was indeed AT his facility, ON his property and UNDER the care, custody and control of Mr. Wells. Therefore Mr. Wells is ultimately responsible for the well being of the horse. Again, take out the capital letters. He'll get it whether the words are capitalized or not.
The horses’ well being while at a training facility is similar to dropping your children off at school. While on school grounds it is the responsibility of the school faculty and staff under the guidance of the principal, to provide your child with a safe learning environment. It is the same responsibility of the facility owner and/or manager to ensure each horse is safe and cared for while they are on their property and under their care. Delete this whole paragraph. There are people who would not believe this to be true, so it's not a very good comparison. Most people do not equate animals as being as important as children--they are livestock or product.
My husband and I train horses and we have never, never had to abuse an animal in any manner, way, shape or form, to get them to perform. To carry that one step further, our horses perform much more difficult work- cutting as per NCHA, and jumping, which is far more difficult than merely performing three gaits (walk, jog and lope) around an arena. Might I also add that abused horses will just not ‘try’ as hard to please as those treated fairly with kindness, patience and respect. Okay, this is a hard one. Most people, and most likely this DA, aren't going to know what "gaits," "cutting," "NCHA," "lope," or even "arena" means. I believe it's important for you to point out that you are horse trainers and you have been more successful with kindness, patience and respect rather than abusing a horse. But put it in terms a layman would know. Point out the successes of people like Clinton Anderson, the Parellis, and Monty Roberts. Give an example of a horse that came to you abused, and your methods changed that horse's attitude.
Mr. Wells has also stated the value of Slow Lopin Scotch is not as high as the other horses in his barn. Dollar value should have absolutely NO bearing on how a horse is handled, treated or cared for. NONE! Remove "NONE!" and take out the capital letters. The horse may have been able to perform to the top levels of the ‘sport’ of showing Mr. Wells aspires to, but following the abuse and torture this horse endured, the mental capacities of Slow Lopin Scotch may never be able to handle even ‘normal’ day to day care, without the long term effects of Mr. Wells’ abuse resurfacing time and again. Again, we're dealing with someone who probably has no sympathy for horses. So I would change this paragraph to read as follows:
Mr... Wells has also stated the value of Slow Lopin Scotch is not as high as the other horses in his barn. Dollar value should have no bearing on how a horse is handled, treated or cared for. The owners most likely paid the same price for training as did other horses in Mr. Wells' barn that are worth more money. Therefore, they deserve to receive the same treatment and results as other horse owners receive at Mr. Wells' barn.
I ask that you reconsider the case against Mr. Wells for the abuse Slow Lopin Scotch endured. For Mr. Wells to go unpunished, just shows that the abuse of animals in your county and under your jurisdiction is considered acceptable. For Mr. Wells to go unpunished also shows those working for the county in the animal control division that although they do their jobs and try to bring justice to those who abuse, they will not be taken seriously if and when the abuser is reprimanded or taken into custody. EXCELLENT paragraph!
If this case is not taken any further and Mr. Wells receives no punishment for his abusive actions or his careless inaction to get proper care for the horse, i.e. calling the veterinarian, this is what the country will perceive, as many eyes are on you. Horse people across the country are watching and hoping for justice to finally be done. This is but one step in a long uphill battle. Way to stick it to him--hitting them where it hurts, which includes their reputation and their pocketbook, is very wise. You can also find out when the next election is and point out that he can lose votes, things like that.
I ask that you take a long hard look at each picture submitted of Slow Lopin Scotch and his injuries and imagine for a moment it were you. Imagine that you had open lacerations left untreated, open and likely infected wounds oozing pus and foul odors that you had to smell constantly. Imagine that you are the one with bone fragments in your jaw causing undetermined amounts of pain as you try to eat. Take this paragraph out. Many, many people don't view animals as having feelings and won't put themselves in their shoes/paws. Plus, if this guy dismissed the case, then he obviously doesn't care much about the feelings of animals.
I ask you again to reconsider the case against Mr. Wells. If for nobody else, reconsider it for Slow Lopin Scotch and the number of other horses who will surely suffer the same torture, should Cleve Wells go unpunished. Again, he won't care about the horse, so remove this paragraph. Ending your letter with a dig at what his decision will reflect leaves him with something very strong to think about.
Thank You,
Name
Business Name
Address
Phone
Here's the same letter that has all the above changes that I've made. (Red + Blue = Purple!)
It has recently come to my attention that the district attorneys office has chosen a discretionary rejection concerning the case against Mr. Cleve Wells for his role in the abuse of a horse under his care named Slow Lopin Scotch.
All I can do is shake my head in amazement and wonder why and how this ever could have happened. It has been stated that your office has received a large amount of correspondence concerning Mr. Wells and his abusive habits which he calls horse training. I should also hope you have read a good number of first hand accounts of the actions of Mr. Wells.
From what I understand the discretionary rejection was chosen due in part to many of the occurrences you learned of happening outside of your jurisdiction. If this is true, then this opportunity to stop someone who obviously has no regard for animals has been completely passed by. If the other occurrences happened in places outside of your jurisdiction, that should communitcate that, in no uncertain terms, Mr. Wells behaves in this same ruthless, uncaring and callous manner while he is away at horse shows and most likely while in the public eye. If he behaves this badly and is this abusive to animals in public, there is no telling what happens to them at ‘home’ on his property and behind his barn doors.
It has also been stated that Mr. Wells claims one of his employees is at fault for the injuries suffered by Slow Lopin Scotch. Again, whether the injuries came from the abusive hands of Mr. Wells or one of his employees, the horse was indeed at his facility, physically on his property and therefore under the care, custody and control of Mr. Wells. Therefore, Mr. Wells is ultimately responsible for the well being of the horse.
My husband and I train horses and we have never had to resort to methods that cause injuries to an animal in any manner, way, shape, or form to get them to perform. As horse trainers, we have been far more successful with kidness, patience and respect rather than resorting to the kinds of abusive methods Mr. Wells used on Slow Lopin Scotch. This success is not just prevalent in our personal business; dozens of public figures that are considered high quality horse trainers such as Monty Roberts, Clinton Anderson, Pat and Linda Parelli, and Dennis Reis use positive reinforcement and not in punishment in their day-to-day training, and that message is strong and widely accepted as the "right way" to train horses in the horse community.
Mr. Wells has also stated the value of Slow Lopin Scotch is not as high as the other horses in his barn. Dollar value should have no bearing on how a horse is handled, treated or cared for. The owners most likely paid the same price for training as did the owners of other horses in Mr. Wells' barn that are worth more money. Therefore, they and their horses deserve to receive the same treatment and results as other horses and owners receive at Mr. Wells' barn.
I ask that you reconsider the case against Mr. Wells for the abuse Slow Lopin Scotch endured. For Mr. Wells to go unpunished shows that the abuse of animals in your county and under your jurisdiction is considered acceptable. It also shows those working for the County in the Animal Control Division that although they do their jobs and try to bring justice to those who abuse, they will not be taken seriously if and when the abuser is reprimanded or taken into custody.
If this case is not taken any further and Mr. Wells receives no punishment for his abusive actions or his careless inaction to get proper care for the horse, i.e., calling the veterinarian, this is what the country will perceive, as many eyes are on you. Horse people across the country are watching and hoping for justice to finally be done. This is but one step in a long uphill battle.
If you have any questions or concerns, or would like to discuss this matter further, please feel free to contact me at the below information. Thank you for your time.
I hope this information is helpful and gives you insight and guidance in how to write your own letters. If you'd like me to critique your letter, please email me via my website (linked at the bottom of this blog). Please note that I may not necessarily write you back right away, but I will get to your email as soon as I can.
Good luck in helping those who cannot help themselves, whether it be human or animal. We can only make a difference if we stand up for what is right!
My friend's letter is in blue text; my comments are in red text.
To the office of
District Attorney
Honorable Dale Hanna
Phone (817) 556-6802
Fax (817) 556-6816
Guinn Justice Center
204 S. Buffalo Ave Room 209
Cleburne, Texas 76033
Re: SLOW LOPIN SCOTCH It would probably be better if your reason for the letter was Cleve Wells, or the actual case number, if you can find it. They most likely won't remember the horse's name (unfortunately).
It has recently come to my attention that the district attorneys office has chosen a discretionary rejection concerning the case against Mr. Cleve Wells for his role in the abuse of a horse under his care named Slow Lopin Scotch.
All I can do is shake my head in amazement and wonder why and how this ever could have happened? use a period here instead of a ? It has been stated that your office has received a large amount of correspondence concerning Mr. Wells and his abusive habits which he calls horse training. I should also hope you have read a good number of first hand accounts of the actions of Mr. Wells. I can assure you that there is absolutely NO reason on earth a horse should suffer the injuries to the extent of those displayed in the pictures of Slow Lopin Scotch, nor the sheer torture he surely endured. NONE whatsoever! Delete this last sentence. Dramatic language such as this is ignored and it can reflect bad on you. Take out all capital letter words as well.
From what I understand the discretionary rejection was chosen due in part to many of the occurrences you learned of, happening outside of your jurisdiction. If this is true, did you not consider that this ONE case is YOUR chance to STOP someone who obviously has no regard for animals? Turn this into a sentence rather than a question. This is a very derogatory question toward the DA--if I were him, I'd drop your letter right now and not read the rest. You want to approach him with facts, not be accusatory. Accusations only piss people off. If the other occurrences happened in places outside of your jurisdiction, that should tell you in no uncertain terms, Mr. Wells behaves in this same ruthless, uncaring and callous manner while he is away at horse shows and most likely while IN the public eye. If he behaves this badly and is this abusive to animals in public, there is no telling what happens to them at ‘home’ on his property and behind his barn doors.
It has also been stated that Mr. Wells claims one of his employees is at fault for the injuries suffered by Slow Lopin Scotch. Again, let me assure you, take "let me assure you" out--another accusatory statement, as if you know more than him. Okay, of course you do, but you don't want to question his job as the DA. whether the injuries came from the abusive hands of Mr. Wells or one of his employees, the horse was indeed AT his facility, ON his property and UNDER the care, custody and control of Mr. Wells. Therefore Mr. Wells is ultimately responsible for the well being of the horse. Again, take out the capital letters. He'll get it whether the words are capitalized or not.
The horses’ well being while at a training facility is similar to dropping your children off at school. While on school grounds it is the responsibility of the school faculty and staff under the guidance of the principal, to provide your child with a safe learning environment. It is the same responsibility of the facility owner and/or manager to ensure each horse is safe and cared for while they are on their property and under their care. Delete this whole paragraph. There are people who would not believe this to be true, so it's not a very good comparison. Most people do not equate animals as being as important as children--they are livestock or product.
My husband and I train horses and we have never, never had to abuse an animal in any manner, way, shape or form, to get them to perform. To carry that one step further, our horses perform much more difficult work- cutting as per NCHA, and jumping, which is far more difficult than merely performing three gaits (walk, jog and lope) around an arena. Might I also add that abused horses will just not ‘try’ as hard to please as those treated fairly with kindness, patience and respect. Okay, this is a hard one. Most people, and most likely this DA, aren't going to know what "gaits," "cutting," "NCHA," "lope," or even "arena" means. I believe it's important for you to point out that you are horse trainers and you have been more successful with kindness, patience and respect rather than abusing a horse. But put it in terms a layman would know. Point out the successes of people like Clinton Anderson, the Parellis, and Monty Roberts. Give an example of a horse that came to you abused, and your methods changed that horse's attitude.
Mr. Wells has also stated the value of Slow Lopin Scotch is not as high as the other horses in his barn. Dollar value should have absolutely NO bearing on how a horse is handled, treated or cared for. NONE! Remove "NONE!" and take out the capital letters. The horse may have been able to perform to the top levels of the ‘sport’ of showing Mr. Wells aspires to, but following the abuse and torture this horse endured, the mental capacities of Slow Lopin Scotch may never be able to handle even ‘normal’ day to day care, without the long term effects of Mr. Wells’ abuse resurfacing time and again. Again, we're dealing with someone who probably has no sympathy for horses. So I would change this paragraph to read as follows:
Mr... Wells has also stated the value of Slow Lopin Scotch is not as high as the other horses in his barn. Dollar value should have no bearing on how a horse is handled, treated or cared for. The owners most likely paid the same price for training as did other horses in Mr. Wells' barn that are worth more money. Therefore, they deserve to receive the same treatment and results as other horse owners receive at Mr. Wells' barn.
I ask that you reconsider the case against Mr. Wells for the abuse Slow Lopin Scotch endured. For Mr. Wells to go unpunished, just shows that the abuse of animals in your county and under your jurisdiction is considered acceptable. For Mr. Wells to go unpunished also shows those working for the county in the animal control division that although they do their jobs and try to bring justice to those who abuse, they will not be taken seriously if and when the abuser is reprimanded or taken into custody. EXCELLENT paragraph!
If this case is not taken any further and Mr. Wells receives no punishment for his abusive actions or his careless inaction to get proper care for the horse, i.e. calling the veterinarian, this is what the country will perceive, as many eyes are on you. Horse people across the country are watching and hoping for justice to finally be done. This is but one step in a long uphill battle. Way to stick it to him--hitting them where it hurts, which includes their reputation and their pocketbook, is very wise. You can also find out when the next election is and point out that he can lose votes, things like that.
I ask that you take a long hard look at each picture submitted of Slow Lopin Scotch and his injuries and imagine for a moment it were you. Imagine that you had open lacerations left untreated, open and likely infected wounds oozing pus and foul odors that you had to smell constantly. Imagine that you are the one with bone fragments in your jaw causing undetermined amounts of pain as you try to eat. Take this paragraph out. Many, many people don't view animals as having feelings and won't put themselves in their shoes/paws. Plus, if this guy dismissed the case, then he obviously doesn't care much about the feelings of animals.
I ask you again to reconsider the case against Mr. Wells. If for nobody else, reconsider it for Slow Lopin Scotch and the number of other horses who will surely suffer the same torture, should Cleve Wells go unpunished. Again, he won't care about the horse, so remove this paragraph. Ending your letter with a dig at what his decision will reflect leaves him with something very strong to think about.
Thank You,
Name
Business Name
Address
Phone
Here's the same letter that has all the above changes that I've made. (Red + Blue = Purple!)
It has recently come to my attention that the district attorneys office has chosen a discretionary rejection concerning the case against Mr. Cleve Wells for his role in the abuse of a horse under his care named Slow Lopin Scotch.
All I can do is shake my head in amazement and wonder why and how this ever could have happened. It has been stated that your office has received a large amount of correspondence concerning Mr. Wells and his abusive habits which he calls horse training. I should also hope you have read a good number of first hand accounts of the actions of Mr. Wells.
From what I understand the discretionary rejection was chosen due in part to many of the occurrences you learned of happening outside of your jurisdiction. If this is true, then this opportunity to stop someone who obviously has no regard for animals has been completely passed by. If the other occurrences happened in places outside of your jurisdiction, that should communitcate that, in no uncertain terms, Mr. Wells behaves in this same ruthless, uncaring and callous manner while he is away at horse shows and most likely while in the public eye. If he behaves this badly and is this abusive to animals in public, there is no telling what happens to them at ‘home’ on his property and behind his barn doors.
It has also been stated that Mr. Wells claims one of his employees is at fault for the injuries suffered by Slow Lopin Scotch. Again, whether the injuries came from the abusive hands of Mr. Wells or one of his employees, the horse was indeed at his facility, physically on his property and therefore under the care, custody and control of Mr. Wells. Therefore, Mr. Wells is ultimately responsible for the well being of the horse.
My husband and I train horses and we have never had to resort to methods that cause injuries to an animal in any manner, way, shape, or form to get them to perform. As horse trainers, we have been far more successful with kidness, patience and respect rather than resorting to the kinds of abusive methods Mr. Wells used on Slow Lopin Scotch. This success is not just prevalent in our personal business; dozens of public figures that are considered high quality horse trainers such as Monty Roberts, Clinton Anderson, Pat and Linda Parelli, and Dennis Reis use positive reinforcement and not in punishment in their day-to-day training, and that message is strong and widely accepted as the "right way" to train horses in the horse community.
Mr. Wells has also stated the value of Slow Lopin Scotch is not as high as the other horses in his barn. Dollar value should have no bearing on how a horse is handled, treated or cared for. The owners most likely paid the same price for training as did the owners of other horses in Mr. Wells' barn that are worth more money. Therefore, they and their horses deserve to receive the same treatment and results as other horses and owners receive at Mr. Wells' barn.
I ask that you reconsider the case against Mr. Wells for the abuse Slow Lopin Scotch endured. For Mr. Wells to go unpunished shows that the abuse of animals in your county and under your jurisdiction is considered acceptable. It also shows those working for the County in the Animal Control Division that although they do their jobs and try to bring justice to those who abuse, they will not be taken seriously if and when the abuser is reprimanded or taken into custody.
If this case is not taken any further and Mr. Wells receives no punishment for his abusive actions or his careless inaction to get proper care for the horse, i.e., calling the veterinarian, this is what the country will perceive, as many eyes are on you. Horse people across the country are watching and hoping for justice to finally be done. This is but one step in a long uphill battle.
If you have any questions or concerns, or would like to discuss this matter further, please feel free to contact me at the below information. Thank you for your time.
I hope this information is helpful and gives you insight and guidance in how to write your own letters. If you'd like me to critique your letter, please email me via my website (linked at the bottom of this blog). Please note that I may not necessarily write you back right away, but I will get to your email as soon as I can.
Good luck in helping those who cannot help themselves, whether it be human or animal. We can only make a difference if we stand up for what is right!
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
NEWS and ARTICLES - New Bill for State of KY to Help End Soring
The State of KY is trying to pass a bill where State Department of Agriculture inspectors would be required at EVERY TWH show in KY. They would supercede local HIOs and DQPs, and the horse industry would no longer be policing itself in the State of KY. Click here for the bill, and click here for the article in the Kentucky Herald.
There is talk that this is already receiving overwhelming support in the KY Senate, especially in light of the fact that the World Equestrian Games will be held in KY this year and they have a zero tolerance of abuse. I think it's also in light of the problems the KWHA has caused against the USDA and that their VP Gary Oliver was in court last year after having been sued for putting acid on a horse's leg that ate through the animal's pastern. He directly admitted that his actions were what any normal TWH trainer would have done (i.e., put acid on the horse's legs to get the show gait).
I urge everyone, even if you don't live in KY, to take time to write to the KY State Legislature and let them know your support. There are still going to be those who will fight this, but we must prevail and make sure the support that is already there stays there. It may take a while to send out emails and letters, but it will be worth it when we speak for the horse when it cannot and ask them to support this bill to save the TWH.
Click here for the list of Senate members. Click on the person's name and there is a link to their physical address and email address.
Click here for the list of House members. Again, click on the person's name and there is a link to their physical address and email address.
If you live in KY, click here to find out who is your direct legislator.
Thanks for the support!
There is talk that this is already receiving overwhelming support in the KY Senate, especially in light of the fact that the World Equestrian Games will be held in KY this year and they have a zero tolerance of abuse. I think it's also in light of the problems the KWHA has caused against the USDA and that their VP Gary Oliver was in court last year after having been sued for putting acid on a horse's leg that ate through the animal's pastern. He directly admitted that his actions were what any normal TWH trainer would have done (i.e., put acid on the horse's legs to get the show gait).
I urge everyone, even if you don't live in KY, to take time to write to the KY State Legislature and let them know your support. There are still going to be those who will fight this, but we must prevail and make sure the support that is already there stays there. It may take a while to send out emails and letters, but it will be worth it when we speak for the horse when it cannot and ask them to support this bill to save the TWH.
Click here for the list of Senate members. Click on the person's name and there is a link to their physical address and email address.
Click here for the list of House members. Again, click on the person's name and there is a link to their physical address and email address.
If you live in KY, click here to find out who is your direct legislator.
Thanks for the support!
ARTICLE - Repost: Court of Appeals Denies Dericksons' Petition for Review
I accidentally deleted my original post about this, so I'm reposting it now. Sorry for any confusion!
On November 10, 2008, The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied the Dericksons' petition to review the results of their case. Click here for the link directly to the docket as posted on the USDA's website.
Direct quote from the conclusion of the docket:
"Because we conclude that the JO [Judicial Officer] had substantial evidence to support his findings that: (1) the Dericksons are liable for transporting Just American Magic; (2) J. Derickson is liable for entering Just American Magic; and (3) the Operating Plan does not limit APHIS’s ability to impose legal sanctions on H. Derickson, we DENY the Dericksons’ petition for review."
There we have it, folks. They sored their horse and they are now paying for it. The sad part is that Herbert Derickson's father, H.T. Derickson, used to sore his horses, but he changed his ways and now shows only sound horses. It's really too bad that his son did not follow in his footsteps. Perhaps this will make him rethink his decision to do what he's done. We can only hope.
On November 10, 2008, The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied the Dericksons' petition to review the results of their case. Click here for the link directly to the docket as posted on the USDA's website.
Direct quote from the conclusion of the docket:
"Because we conclude that the JO [Judicial Officer] had substantial evidence to support his findings that: (1) the Dericksons are liable for transporting Just American Magic; (2) J. Derickson is liable for entering Just American Magic; and (3) the Operating Plan does not limit APHIS’s ability to impose legal sanctions on H. Derickson, we DENY the Dericksons’ petition for review."
There we have it, folks. They sored their horse and they are now paying for it. The sad part is that Herbert Derickson's father, H.T. Derickson, used to sore his horses, but he changed his ways and now shows only sound horses. It's really too bad that his son did not follow in his footsteps. Perhaps this will make him rethink his decision to do what he's done. We can only hope.
NEWS and ARTICLE - Repost: HSUS Applauds Court of Appeals Decision on Derickson Case
I accidentally deleted my original post about this article, so I'm reposting it. Sorry for any confusion!
Click here for the press release as posted on the HSUS website on November 17, 2008.
Direct quotes from the article:
"The Humane Society of the United States applauds a recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upholding a U.S. Department of Agriculture ruling that Herbert and Jill Derickson of Tennessee violated the Horse Protection Act when they transported and entered a sored Tennessee Walking Horse, Just American Magic, in a 2002 horse show.
"Soring involves the deliberate infliction of pain on the legs and feet of a horse, creating severe pain and forcing an exaggerated, high-stepping gait.
" 'This decision sends a clear message to anyone who abuses a Tennessee Walking Horse that the U.S. Department of Agriculture can and will strictly enforce the Horse Protection Act,' said Keith Dane, director of equine protection for The HSUS. 'We commend the court for its decision and hope this case signals a renewed USDA resolve to protect Tennessee Walking Horses and other victims of soring.' "
Click here for the press release as posted on the HSUS website on November 17, 2008.
Direct quotes from the article:
"The Humane Society of the United States applauds a recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upholding a U.S. Department of Agriculture ruling that Herbert and Jill Derickson of Tennessee violated the Horse Protection Act when they transported and entered a sored Tennessee Walking Horse, Just American Magic, in a 2002 horse show.
"Soring involves the deliberate infliction of pain on the legs and feet of a horse, creating severe pain and forcing an exaggerated, high-stepping gait.
" 'This decision sends a clear message to anyone who abuses a Tennessee Walking Horse that the U.S. Department of Agriculture can and will strictly enforce the Horse Protection Act,' said Keith Dane, director of equine protection for The HSUS. 'We commend the court for its decision and hope this case signals a renewed USDA resolve to protect Tennessee Walking Horses and other victims of soring.' "
Thursday, February 19, 2009
NEWS - Kentucky Horse Racing Commission decides to withhold breeders' incentive from KWHA
The Kentucky Race Horse Commission (KRHC) has made a tremendous stand and has decided not to award any more of the breeders' incentive taxes to the KWHA.
Click here for the article.
Click here for the editorial.
This is an amazing step in the history of the TWH. These monsters who torture horses are finally getting what they deserve.
Please see my Catagory concerning the KWHA* to read more about this organization and its continued abuse of the TWH. *Coming soon--I need to go through the posts first! :)
Click here for the article.
Click here for the editorial.
This is an amazing step in the history of the TWH. These monsters who torture horses are finally getting what they deserve.
Please see my Catagory concerning the KWHA* to read more about this organization and its continued abuse of the TWH. *Coming soon--I need to go through the posts first! :)
Monday, February 16, 2009
HOW YOU CAN HELP - Writing Letters, Part 2: Format
So after discussing word use, those words have to go on paper or email. There is a proper format to writing letters and emails, and if your documents follow this format, you'll have a better chance to get your point across.
When you write your letter, it's best that it's typed so it is legible. Computers have plenty of word processing programs out there, and sometimes they are even programmed to help you write the letter. Even dusting off the old typewriter is appropriate.
To save time and space, I'm not going to go over how to use different kinds of computer programs. If you have trouble, head on over to your local library or college and ask for help in the computer department. There are always plenty of people out to help.
Research who should receive the letter. Before even starting your letter, research exactly who you need to send it to. For example, in the case of Cleve Wells, many people are writing to the American Quarter Horse Association (AQHA) to reconsider his association with him. It's best to not only write to the president of the AQHA, but also to other influential positions in the association. The vice president and members of the board of directors should also be carbon copied (cced) on the letter. Your letter will not only be read by multiple people, but it will also better your chances of the letter getting to someone who will take action on your request.
Font style and size. The font is the type of lettering you use. Choose a font style that is easy to read, such as Arial, Times New Roman, Courier, or Verdana. Don't make your font size any larger than 12 point and no smaller than 11 point. Many fonts can be read in 10 point, but it's best to avoid this size as some people may have a hard time with it.
When you write your letter, it's best that it's typed so it is legible. Computers have plenty of word processing programs out there, and sometimes they are even programmed to help you write the letter. Even dusting off the old typewriter is appropriate.
To save time and space, I'm not going to go over how to use different kinds of computer programs. If you have trouble, head on over to your local library or college and ask for help in the computer department. There are always plenty of people out to help.
Research who should receive the letter. Before even starting your letter, research exactly who you need to send it to. For example, in the case of Cleve Wells, many people are writing to the American Quarter Horse Association (AQHA) to reconsider his association with him. It's best to not only write to the president of the AQHA, but also to other influential positions in the association. The vice president and members of the board of directors should also be carbon copied (cced) on the letter. Your letter will not only be read by multiple people, but it will also better your chances of the letter getting to someone who will take action on your request.
Font style and size. The font is the type of lettering you use. Choose a font style that is easy to read, such as Arial, Times New Roman, Courier, or Verdana. Don't make your font size any larger than 12 point and no smaller than 11 point. Many fonts can be read in 10 point, but it's best to avoid this size as some people may have a hard time with it.
Check your references. If you're going to quote references in your article, be sure you include where you got the reference from and give exact webpages, magazine issue numbers, etc. These can be included at the end of the letter if you'd like.
Keep your letter at one page. Remember that these are people who receive a lot of mail, so you have to be able to keep it short and sweet. Avoid a lot of descriptive words and run-on sentences. If you can't tell how many pages your email is, print it out.
Always include your contact information. Of course it's okay to be annonymous if you believe you are alerting them to a sensitive issue that you don't want to come back to you. However, association officers and board members should follow basic ethics and not pass around your name if you're writing them about a sensitive issue.
Proper letter format. The following is the proper letter format for a regular letter that you're sending in the mail. The information in the brackets are instructions to be used when writing the letter. An email will have the same format, only without the address block, date, and signature block--that is already included with your email.
Your Name
Address
City, State, Zip
[insert four blank lines]
Date
[insert four blank lines]
Recipient's Name
Company or Association
Address
City, State, Zip
[insert one blank line between paragraphs from here on out]
Re: Reason for your letter [use bold text]
Dear Recipient's Name:
[Include body text here]
[Include one space between each paragraph]
Sincerely,
[insert four blank lines, include your signature here]
Your Name
Your Contact Information [include phone number and/or email]
cc: Additional Names, with titles, one name per line.
The following links are for more information on writing a letter or an email.
The OWL at Purdue: Writing the Basic Business Letter
Read Write Think: The Letter Generator
PRESENTATIONS - USDA January 2009 Thermography Seminar Available on DVD FOR FREE!
A few days ago, a video was posted online on the Walking Horse Chat detailing the thermography seminar that the USDA held following their DQP training sessions. Since I am not a member of WHC, I can't view the video. So I asked around, and I found out from a friend that the USDA is giving out this video for free!
This video detailed how thermography is going to be used at horse shows and how it's a fool-proof way to detect soring. Thermography shows via the amount of heat whether or not the horse is in pain. The USDA has conducted studies on themography for several years now, and they have determined that there is a difference between the heat signature of having been worked versus the legs being inflammed from pain.
If you want to see it, email Dr. Cezar, the head of the HPA program, at rachel.cezar@aphis.usda.gov. Please send her your physical address (no P.O. boxes, please) to receive the DVD. I am going to find out if I can post it, but I'm not sure if it'll be allowed or not, so if not, then perhaps I can transcribe it. Either way, I'll report on it more once I receive it from Dr. Cezar.
A very happy THANK YOU goes out to the USDA for making this information available to the public. This is key in the work being done to stop soring: the information has to be out there so both sorers and non-sorers alike understand why the problem needs to end. This change should really make a dent in saving the horse we all so love.
This video detailed how thermography is going to be used at horse shows and how it's a fool-proof way to detect soring. Thermography shows via the amount of heat whether or not the horse is in pain. The USDA has conducted studies on themography for several years now, and they have determined that there is a difference between the heat signature of having been worked versus the legs being inflammed from pain.
If you want to see it, email Dr. Cezar, the head of the HPA program, at rachel.cezar@aphis.usda.gov. Please send her your physical address (no P.O. boxes, please) to receive the DVD. I am going to find out if I can post it, but I'm not sure if it'll be allowed or not, so if not, then perhaps I can transcribe it. Either way, I'll report on it more once I receive it from Dr. Cezar.
A very happy THANK YOU goes out to the USDA for making this information available to the public. This is key in the work being done to stop soring: the information has to be out there so both sorers and non-sorers alike understand why the problem needs to end. This change should really make a dent in saving the horse we all so love.
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
HOW YOU CAN HELP - Writing Letters, Part 1: Language Use
It seems that horse abuse cases abound, and that even though we're making progress and helping animals, there always seems to be someone out there who is going to continue to abuse them in another horrific way.
However, because of the World Wide Web, we can now learn more about what's going on much quicker than we ever could with magazines, books and newspapers. We are also given more resources so we are able to express our opinion to those who have the power to stop such criminals, or at least keep them from having venues where they can continue to commit such horrible acts.
A few days ago, a friend sent me a letter she wrote to the judge presiding over the Cleve Wells case that I commented on a few posts ago. She asked for our opinion on what it said. So, being the English major that I am, I kicked into technical editing gear and edited her letter. She suggested I help explain to people how to write effective letters to get the message across as a guest blogger on some other horse blogs I read. But I thought heck, I've got my own blog--I'll post it here!
So, I'm writing this three-part series to help everyone out there write a proper letter and/or email to authorities about abuse cases and other important ethics of society that anyone may feel compelled to write about. While there is no guarantee that your letter will be followed or even read, there are certain steps you can take in your letter to make it more likely that the authority you send your letter to will listen and even be prompted to act.
Writing Letters, Part 1: Language Use
As an English major and a technical editor, I have learned that words are powerful. They can help, hurt, educate, and decimate just about anything. I'm not just talking about the occassional potatoe misspelling, either. Think about amazing speeches that people have made, how contracts and documents can change the shape of the world, or even how your parents talked with you when you did something wrong. All of these can create a lasting impression, whether positive, negative, funny, or sad. It's up to us and how we use those words as to how our point will be viewed.
So, it's important to remember that words do have power, so how you use them is extremely important. In my experience in dealing with soring, I have learned that screaming at people that they are wrong and they don't know what they're talking about gets me nowhere. That person is either going to fight back or they are just going to walk away, thinking you don't know what you're talking about. Instead, I found that being calm and rational helps others to feel the same, and suddenly their ears are open. I have gotten to talk with people high up in horse organizations and they have listened, and I have even had a famous trainer call me personally to ask me for advice--ME! I was shocked! But this communicated to me that the way I was expressing my feelings and attacking the problem was the right way to go.
The following tips relate to how best to use words when you are writing your letter.
Tip #1: Avoid malicious language. Accusing people directly, calling them names, or using language that can make them angry or upset ("Are you blind?" "What are you, an idiot?") is not productive. In fact, it can quickly turn someone off to your cause. I have physically deleted emails that were written that way toward me. It didn't matter what the point was--I wasn't going to take that written verbal abuse. The same can happen to you.
Tip #2: Avoid dramatic language. We are all passionate about horses, of course. However, our passion needs to be kept in check. Avoid language like "this absolutely must stop right now" or "think about how the horses feel." Capital letters, should be avoided, as THEY GIVE THE IMPRESSION THAT YOU'RE SHOUTING. Remember that you are writing to an audience that may not even know much about horses or care about animals one way or another. If we start begging for the horse, then we can suddenly be seen as a wacko tree-hugger who has nothing better to do than send crazy letters.
Tip #3: Use language that is direct and to the point. Do your best to stick to the point. Remember, whomever you are writing to probably gets thousands of emails and letters a day. That person probably has to weed through a lot of it to get to what's important to their job. So be sure your letter is short and direct. This will make for easy reading for the receiver.
Tip #4: Back up your claims with facts. Facts will always stand over hearsay and rumors. Don't say "I heard" or "A friend told me"--be able to say "I read in such-and-such article that...." Include links to websites, or, if the information can all be fit on one page, include pictures or quotes from where you got your information from.
Tip #5: Don't tell people stuff they already know. Remember that if you are writing to someone who is working on the case, such as a judge or DA, they will already know the main facts. You don't have to retell them. Reference the case once at the beginning of the letter, and then get straight to the point of what you want to say. The same goes for the head of a horse organization. If you are alerting someone to the problem that may not already know about it, you can give a little more than just a quick statement that you are referring to the case.
Tip #6: Don't reference anyone except yourself unless you have a real quote to back it up. For example, don't say things like, "Both me and my friend next door think...." Unless you have their permission to say it, or you have a petition to go along with your letter, then don't talk about others. Make the words your own--they will stand strong just fine. Direct quotes can be used, such as quotes from articles or videos about the case.
Tip #7: Don't make assumptions. Don't assume that your friends will back you on this, that the general public thinks this is wrong, or that you think such-and-such horse organization agrees with you. Once again, make the words your own. You are here to express how you feel about a situation and why you feel it, not to express how you think others feel.
Tip #8: Be sympathetic yet firm about the situation. For example, you can say "I understand that you are busy, so I won't take up much of your time." Then keep your letter short and to the point. Or you can say "I understand that you might not be aware of the implications of horse abuse." You can follow those kinds of statements with very firm ones. "Statistics show us that animal abuse leads to people abuse--many convicted serial killers were known to 'practice' on animals before they started on humans." Or be firm about their position in society. To a judge up for re-election: "The newspaper and online articles indicate that the community where this happened is outraged at the lack of progress in resolving this matter, which could jeopardize those in positions of importance that are dealing with the case."
Tip #9: Don't be afraid to ask for help when writing your letter. Have someone else read your letter for you and give suggestions, or go to a friend who's already written a letter and ask for ideas on what to talk about. Don't copy someone else's letter word for word, however. You don't want the recipient to receive the exact same letter only from different senders. Make your letter your own, just as you make your words your own. This has far more impact than a generic, sign-your-name-here formatted letter.
Tip #10: When you finish your letter, set it aside before mailing it and reread it later. It is important to step back and then reread the letter later. Give yourself at least an hour if not about half a day to let the letter sit and stew. All of your feelings are now on paper, so you can afford to stop and reassess. Not only will you be better apt to catch spelling and grammar mistakes, but you'll also be able to focus on how you used your words and whether or not they are effective or need to change. There's nothing worse than firing off an email without having reread it first and realizing you've misquoted someone or you have even emailed the wrong person.
The following is my letter that I wrote to the World Equestrian Games regarding whether or not they will be allowing the exhibition of TWHs at their venue. To give you some background, the 2010 WEG is being held at the Kentucky Horse Park in Lexington, Kentucky. Due to the proximity to Tennessee and that other American breeds will be showcased, TWHBEA approached WEG about showcasing TWHs during the breed demonstrations at the games. Originally, because of the continued debacle that is the sore horse, WEG said no. But TWHBEA kept pushing. Here is the letter I wrote to ask them to keep Big Lick and all padded horses out of the WEG.
Silver Phoenix Ranch, LLC
[Address]
[City-State-Zip]
October 23, 2008
Ms. Holley Groshek
Director of Administration
2010 World Equestrian Games Way
Lexington, KY 40511-2010
Re: Equine Demonstrations of the Tennessee Walking Horse
Dear Ms. Groshek:
My name is Andrea Ohnstad, and I am extremely excited about the World Equestrian Games (WEG) of 2010 being held in the United States at the Kentucky Horse Park. This is an amazing opportunity for the horse industry in general and for breeds to be showcased so attendees can learn more about the riding and ownership opportunities available for all breeds.
As an owner and advocate of Tennessee Walking Horses (TWH), I would like to express a serious concern that is prevalent in our breed. I imagine that you are aware of the serious issue of soring, the practice of using chemical or mechanical means to cause a TWH pain in his front limbs in order to lift his legs higher for more animation of the gait in the show ring. This practice is currently found to exist in the show ring, particularly with the Performance or “Big Lick” horse. These horses are forced to carry stacks of pads on their front feet in order to exaggerate the natural, smooth gait for which the breed was originally bred. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) passed the Horse Protection Act (HPA) in 1970 to address this very issue, but soring is still prevalent. USDA statistics and recent evidence available on various websites show us that it is still the main form of training TWHs for the show ring. There is also evidence that Plantation and Heavy-Shod TWHs suffer from further forms of soring such as pressure shoeing or road foundering, where pain in the foot is achieved through mechanical means so the horse will lift his legs higher.
I would like to request that the committee tasked with selecting horses for breed demonstrations consider not allowing Performance or Plantation TWHs to perform at the 2010 WEG. I believe that the chances of a sored horse being showcased are too great for the WEG to take a chance on. In addition, the Performance and Plantation horses are a very poor representation of the breed. The exaggerated gait is considered unattractive by the general public when they see it, whether or not they know about soring. It would behoove all representatives of the WEG if the public were exposed to the natural, sound gait and versatility for which the breed was originally developed rather than an outdated, inaccurate and awkward representation of a very majestic and noble American breed.
If you need help with finding quality horses to showcase at the 2010 WEG, I suggest contacting the National Walking Horse Association, Inc. (NWHA), whose home office is located directly on the Kentucky Horse Park grounds. I also recommend Friends of Sound Horses, Inc. (FOSH) as another resource for sound, naturally gaited TWHs. I am a member and volunteer on committees for both organizations, and I find that their ethics, show venues and efforts to educate the public are exemplary and worthy of worldwide public exposure.
If you need additional information or have any questions, feel free to contact me directly at the below contact information. I am more than happy to provide any help I can. Thank you very much for your consideration of this request.
Sincerely,
Andrea Ohnstad
Silver Phoenix Ranch, LLC
XXX-XXX-XXXX
www.silverphoenixranch.com
cc: Maggie Daniels, WEG Equine Relations and Special Projects Coordinator
David O’Connor, USEF President
Carrie Mortensen, Director Breeds and Western
Jack Kelly, WEG 2010 Foundation CEO
I don't know what kind of impact my letter had, but I did get a personal email response from one of the people involved with the WEG saying they would make sure my letter got to the right person. That meant a lot in that I know someone seriously considered what I had to say. That is the goal all of our letters should have: to make an impact on someone so that action is taken.
However, because of the World Wide Web, we can now learn more about what's going on much quicker than we ever could with magazines, books and newspapers. We are also given more resources so we are able to express our opinion to those who have the power to stop such criminals, or at least keep them from having venues where they can continue to commit such horrible acts.
A few days ago, a friend sent me a letter she wrote to the judge presiding over the Cleve Wells case that I commented on a few posts ago. She asked for our opinion on what it said. So, being the English major that I am, I kicked into technical editing gear and edited her letter. She suggested I help explain to people how to write effective letters to get the message across as a guest blogger on some other horse blogs I read. But I thought heck, I've got my own blog--I'll post it here!
So, I'm writing this three-part series to help everyone out there write a proper letter and/or email to authorities about abuse cases and other important ethics of society that anyone may feel compelled to write about. While there is no guarantee that your letter will be followed or even read, there are certain steps you can take in your letter to make it more likely that the authority you send your letter to will listen and even be prompted to act.
Writing Letters, Part 1: Language Use
As an English major and a technical editor, I have learned that words are powerful. They can help, hurt, educate, and decimate just about anything. I'm not just talking about the occassional potatoe misspelling, either. Think about amazing speeches that people have made, how contracts and documents can change the shape of the world, or even how your parents talked with you when you did something wrong. All of these can create a lasting impression, whether positive, negative, funny, or sad. It's up to us and how we use those words as to how our point will be viewed.
So, it's important to remember that words do have power, so how you use them is extremely important. In my experience in dealing with soring, I have learned that screaming at people that they are wrong and they don't know what they're talking about gets me nowhere. That person is either going to fight back or they are just going to walk away, thinking you don't know what you're talking about. Instead, I found that being calm and rational helps others to feel the same, and suddenly their ears are open. I have gotten to talk with people high up in horse organizations and they have listened, and I have even had a famous trainer call me personally to ask me for advice--ME! I was shocked! But this communicated to me that the way I was expressing my feelings and attacking the problem was the right way to go.
The following tips relate to how best to use words when you are writing your letter.
Tip #1: Avoid malicious language. Accusing people directly, calling them names, or using language that can make them angry or upset ("Are you blind?" "What are you, an idiot?") is not productive. In fact, it can quickly turn someone off to your cause. I have physically deleted emails that were written that way toward me. It didn't matter what the point was--I wasn't going to take that written verbal abuse. The same can happen to you.
Tip #2: Avoid dramatic language. We are all passionate about horses, of course. However, our passion needs to be kept in check. Avoid language like "this absolutely must stop right now" or "think about how the horses feel." Capital letters, should be avoided, as THEY GIVE THE IMPRESSION THAT YOU'RE SHOUTING. Remember that you are writing to an audience that may not even know much about horses or care about animals one way or another. If we start begging for the horse, then we can suddenly be seen as a wacko tree-hugger who has nothing better to do than send crazy letters.
Tip #3: Use language that is direct and to the point. Do your best to stick to the point. Remember, whomever you are writing to probably gets thousands of emails and letters a day. That person probably has to weed through a lot of it to get to what's important to their job. So be sure your letter is short and direct. This will make for easy reading for the receiver.
Tip #4: Back up your claims with facts. Facts will always stand over hearsay and rumors. Don't say "I heard" or "A friend told me"--be able to say "I read in such-and-such article that...." Include links to websites, or, if the information can all be fit on one page, include pictures or quotes from where you got your information from.
Tip #5: Don't tell people stuff they already know. Remember that if you are writing to someone who is working on the case, such as a judge or DA, they will already know the main facts. You don't have to retell them. Reference the case once at the beginning of the letter, and then get straight to the point of what you want to say. The same goes for the head of a horse organization. If you are alerting someone to the problem that may not already know about it, you can give a little more than just a quick statement that you are referring to the case.
Tip #6: Don't reference anyone except yourself unless you have a real quote to back it up. For example, don't say things like, "Both me and my friend next door think...." Unless you have their permission to say it, or you have a petition to go along with your letter, then don't talk about others. Make the words your own--they will stand strong just fine. Direct quotes can be used, such as quotes from articles or videos about the case.
Tip #7: Don't make assumptions. Don't assume that your friends will back you on this, that the general public thinks this is wrong, or that you think such-and-such horse organization agrees with you. Once again, make the words your own. You are here to express how you feel about a situation and why you feel it, not to express how you think others feel.
Tip #8: Be sympathetic yet firm about the situation. For example, you can say "I understand that you are busy, so I won't take up much of your time." Then keep your letter short and to the point. Or you can say "I understand that you might not be aware of the implications of horse abuse." You can follow those kinds of statements with very firm ones. "Statistics show us that animal abuse leads to people abuse--many convicted serial killers were known to 'practice' on animals before they started on humans." Or be firm about their position in society. To a judge up for re-election: "The newspaper and online articles indicate that the community where this happened is outraged at the lack of progress in resolving this matter, which could jeopardize those in positions of importance that are dealing with the case."
Tip #9: Don't be afraid to ask for help when writing your letter. Have someone else read your letter for you and give suggestions, or go to a friend who's already written a letter and ask for ideas on what to talk about. Don't copy someone else's letter word for word, however. You don't want the recipient to receive the exact same letter only from different senders. Make your letter your own, just as you make your words your own. This has far more impact than a generic, sign-your-name-here formatted letter.
Tip #10: When you finish your letter, set it aside before mailing it and reread it later. It is important to step back and then reread the letter later. Give yourself at least an hour if not about half a day to let the letter sit and stew. All of your feelings are now on paper, so you can afford to stop and reassess. Not only will you be better apt to catch spelling and grammar mistakes, but you'll also be able to focus on how you used your words and whether or not they are effective or need to change. There's nothing worse than firing off an email without having reread it first and realizing you've misquoted someone or you have even emailed the wrong person.
The following is my letter that I wrote to the World Equestrian Games regarding whether or not they will be allowing the exhibition of TWHs at their venue. To give you some background, the 2010 WEG is being held at the Kentucky Horse Park in Lexington, Kentucky. Due to the proximity to Tennessee and that other American breeds will be showcased, TWHBEA approached WEG about showcasing TWHs during the breed demonstrations at the games. Originally, because of the continued debacle that is the sore horse, WEG said no. But TWHBEA kept pushing. Here is the letter I wrote to ask them to keep Big Lick and all padded horses out of the WEG.
Silver Phoenix Ranch, LLC
[Address]
[City-State-Zip]
October 23, 2008
Ms. Holley Groshek
Director of Administration
2010 World Equestrian Games Way
Lexington, KY 40511-2010
Re: Equine Demonstrations of the Tennessee Walking Horse
Dear Ms. Groshek:
My name is Andrea Ohnstad, and I am extremely excited about the World Equestrian Games (WEG) of 2010 being held in the United States at the Kentucky Horse Park. This is an amazing opportunity for the horse industry in general and for breeds to be showcased so attendees can learn more about the riding and ownership opportunities available for all breeds.
As an owner and advocate of Tennessee Walking Horses (TWH), I would like to express a serious concern that is prevalent in our breed. I imagine that you are aware of the serious issue of soring, the practice of using chemical or mechanical means to cause a TWH pain in his front limbs in order to lift his legs higher for more animation of the gait in the show ring. This practice is currently found to exist in the show ring, particularly with the Performance or “Big Lick” horse. These horses are forced to carry stacks of pads on their front feet in order to exaggerate the natural, smooth gait for which the breed was originally bred. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) passed the Horse Protection Act (HPA) in 1970 to address this very issue, but soring is still prevalent. USDA statistics and recent evidence available on various websites show us that it is still the main form of training TWHs for the show ring. There is also evidence that Plantation and Heavy-Shod TWHs suffer from further forms of soring such as pressure shoeing or road foundering, where pain in the foot is achieved through mechanical means so the horse will lift his legs higher.
I would like to request that the committee tasked with selecting horses for breed demonstrations consider not allowing Performance or Plantation TWHs to perform at the 2010 WEG. I believe that the chances of a sored horse being showcased are too great for the WEG to take a chance on. In addition, the Performance and Plantation horses are a very poor representation of the breed. The exaggerated gait is considered unattractive by the general public when they see it, whether or not they know about soring. It would behoove all representatives of the WEG if the public were exposed to the natural, sound gait and versatility for which the breed was originally developed rather than an outdated, inaccurate and awkward representation of a very majestic and noble American breed.
If you need help with finding quality horses to showcase at the 2010 WEG, I suggest contacting the National Walking Horse Association, Inc. (NWHA), whose home office is located directly on the Kentucky Horse Park grounds. I also recommend Friends of Sound Horses, Inc. (FOSH) as another resource for sound, naturally gaited TWHs. I am a member and volunteer on committees for both organizations, and I find that their ethics, show venues and efforts to educate the public are exemplary and worthy of worldwide public exposure.
If you need additional information or have any questions, feel free to contact me directly at the below contact information. I am more than happy to provide any help I can. Thank you very much for your consideration of this request.
Sincerely,
Andrea Ohnstad
Silver Phoenix Ranch, LLC
XXX-XXX-XXXX
www.silverphoenixranch.com
cc: Maggie Daniels, WEG Equine Relations and Special Projects Coordinator
David O’Connor, USEF President
Carrie Mortensen, Director Breeds and Western
Jack Kelly, WEG 2010 Foundation CEO
I don't know what kind of impact my letter had, but I did get a personal email response from one of the people involved with the WEG saying they would make sure my letter got to the right person. That meant a lot in that I know someone seriously considered what I had to say. That is the goal all of our letters should have: to make an impact on someone so that action is taken.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)