I LOVE that title.
Here's an excellent, current article about what's going on in the sore horse industry from the magazine Animal Sheltering. Click here for the article. It's a phenomenal way to learn about what's happening to these horses.
These are the quotes from the article that had the most impact on me.
"The problem is that this breed has embrased and steeped itself in a very bizarre and artificial look for the horse," says [Keith] Dane [director of equine protection for the HSUS]. "And so, no matter how [some owners and trainers] have to accomplish it, they'll find a way to achieve the gait.
These practices [stacked shoes and soring] are often used on horses early in their lives; yearlings are fitted with stacks and shoes, and are usually under saddle by the age of 2, before their bodies have had proper time to form. The emotional and physical suffering brought on from such training often ruins the horse's placid disposition just as it ruins his feet.
Though these signs [of soring] are as clear an indicator of abuse as a 50-foot banner reading, "We're soring our horses," United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) inspectors are only permitted to assess violations of the federal law on show grounds. APHIS inspectors can't enforce the law in private stables--and sadly, this is where the vast majority of abuse takes place, making for a gaping loophole in the system, and allowing soring to thrive.
"It is sad that innocent people purchase these horses thinking they are getting an experienced, well-trained, gaited horse, only to find that they have been trained for one purpose and one purpose only when it comes time to ride: Go fast, straight, and hot," says [Tamara] Sissom [owner of a formerly padded and sored mare who cannot be rehabilitated to be a flat shod show horse]. Naive new owners either get hurt, spend thousands of dollars on training with little results, or promptly sell them thinking all gaited horses are hot and uncomfortable to ride. Not to mention that the horse is continually passed around via sale barns, because nobody knows what to do with the horse, unless the owner is from the same background of training."
This out-of-the-frying-pan, into-the-fire situation is a sad resolution for everyone involved--particularly the horse.
Monday, November 10, 2008
Monday, November 3, 2008
THOUGHTS - The NHSC Restructuring, Or Lack Thereof
This post is in response to the article about the NHSC restructuring, posted here.
Okay, so let's talk. What did we just read? We just read an article about a meeting where people are just trying to pretend they're going to make changes when really they're just going to rearrange things to make it LOOK like changes have happened, but it'll be business as usual. Let's take a look at the details, shall we?
Dr. John Bennett made the presentation of those findings and had his plan unanimously approved by the NHSC Board of Directors.
Of course it was, because these are all people who don't want to change what's going on, so of course they love what Bennett said.
Tasked with carrying out this policy will be a chief executive officer (CEO) who will work between the policy board and the executive board. The executive board will be made up of a collection of owners and trainers and work just as the NHSC board does today.
WOW, there they are: actually admitting to the fact that things won't change! AMAZING!
Bennett then presented the “boards” that will make up the inside of the house and function within the structure of the HIO. He started with technology and the importance it has with the inspection process. He mentioned digital radiology, thermography and micro-chipping as all important pieces of technology that need to be researched and implemented over time.
WHAT? The USDA VMOs have already implemented this in the shows they go to. The research is already being done. Why do they need to do their own research and implement it "over time?" How about you all step up and start using it NOW. Oh wait, you don't want to do that--then you might actually expose more sore horses. Oops!
Second on the list was a hearing committee. “If you are going to have penalties, there needs to be a method for those accused to have a fair hearing,” Bennett stated. “I believe everyone has the right to a fair and impartial hearing,” he concluded.
I actually agree with this because other horse venues do it: NATRC, USEF, etc. Problem is that we all know it won't be fair and impartial--the hearings will mostly conveniently see the people as innocent and let people continue to get away with soring.
A fourth element would be industry veterinarians who work in the industry on a daily basis and can function like a medical board. They can help with the drugs that are being used and what levels are acceptable and why they are being used as well as provide insight for which foreign substances can be used without harm to the horse. Bennett pointed out that certain groups will never be satisfied with what goes on in the show industry, but respected industry groups will be on board with this plan.
Um, the USDA has already done this: they have deemed that anything except glycerin, mineral oil and petroletum. You can't just choose to go against the HPA, Bennett.
Nope, "certain groups" will never be happy with what you guys do, because those "certain groups" know you are continuing to allow soring! And what groups are you saying are respected? Respected by whom? You? The NHSC? I guarantee you it won't be by the general public, the USEF, or any other group who views the industry as what it truly is: CORRUPT.
The fifth element was a trainers licensing and continuing education program. Continuing education could be anything from business management to scar rule interpretation. With a licensing program trainers that were repeat offenders would see their licenses revoked or some training offered to get those trainers in compliance.
HUH?? How in the hell would business management help with training? And why do you need a licensing program to get licenses revoked? You can choose to do that now if you were serious about ending soring.
Research was another element to the plan. Bennett couldn’t stress enough the importance of research and how it can help with public perception and with allowing the AAEP to continue to work with the industry. “With the AAEP on our side, it will help when we go to the USDA,” stated Bennett.
What kind of research? You don't point out anything here. Plus, how can we trust any research that's done to figure out anything about soring when the sore horse industry is doing the research? And honey, only if you make progress will the AAEP be on your side. You'd better be prepared to do it.
A ninth element was rules/penalties and judges evaluations. Bennett mentioned he didn’t know exactly how to evaluate the judges best but that he had heard many good ideas for this.
And what are they? WHY won't you tell us what ideas you've heard?
Tenth was regional veterinarians. These regional veterinarians would be tasked with overseeing the Designated Qualified Person (DQP) program and the individual performances of those DQPs. He didn’t think it was feasible for every DQP to be a veterinarian but did stress the importance of the consistency of the program and accountability of the program.
Of course you don't want every DQP to be a vet--then they'd expose the industry for what it is. Plus this is one of the ideas in the AAEP White Paper that is guaranteed to help stop soring, so be sure to skirt around this issue as much as possible.
After finishing the presentation Bennett took questions from those in attendance about the proposed plan. Mark Farrar asked “ was there was anything in the white paper that the task force didn’t agree with?” Bennett responded with all of the items in the white paper were valid but not all were practical. He specifically mentioned the urine testing, licensed veterinarians checking all horses and pulling of shoes on performance horses.
NOTE: These are the actions/changes that are guaranteed to determine if a horse is sore or not. So it's pretty damn obvious why they say they're not "practical."
He noted all of the objectives of these could be achieved however through technology or programs within the plan presented.
Sure, they can, if it wouldn't just be business as usual with those programs.\
Farrar also asked, “If we adopt this plan have you talked with the USDA and the AAEP and will they be on board with this plan?” Bennett responded, “Yes and the AAEP will get on board and will be waiting for us to ask for help.”
But we know you won't be asking for help. You know why? Because you'll be glad to keep it so the sore horse continues to win and you continue to get money to line your pockets. You don't need the AAEP to keep the status quo, that's for sure.
Bob Ramsbottom asked, “How will we fund this plan. Will this be left up to the owners to fund this?” Bennett relayed that he didn’t know exactly how to fund the plan and that he had thought a lot about that, “but to be honest, I don’t really know how to fund it.” Frank Neal interjected, “they were tasked with coming up with the plan, it is now the task of the groups within the industry, WHOA, TWHBEA, WHTA, and the Celebration, etc. to fund the execution of this plan.”
I agree with this as well. Neal is absolutely right. You have all decided it's okay to add $1 to each entry fee to implement the USEF drug testing program--how come you can't do that to implement other plans? Because you need to claim that you don't have the money to put into it so you don't ever implement it. Simple way to keep it business as usual.
Overall, this is all just crap. It's just a front to keep things business as usual. None of the serious issues are going to change because they'll just continue to avoid the three main actions that WILL catch sorers (pulling shoes, only using vets as DQPs), not make judges accountable for their choices in the show ring, and not force the industry to pay for these changes. This is pathetic. I can only hope that the USDA will work towards outlawing stacks, heavy shoes, bands, and pads on horses in the show ring in general. That's the only way this can stop--to force the industry to change. It's been 38 years since the HPA became a Federal law--it's obvious they are not going to change their ways on their own.
Okay, so let's talk. What did we just read? We just read an article about a meeting where people are just trying to pretend they're going to make changes when really they're just going to rearrange things to make it LOOK like changes have happened, but it'll be business as usual. Let's take a look at the details, shall we?
Dr. John Bennett made the presentation of those findings and had his plan unanimously approved by the NHSC Board of Directors.
Of course it was, because these are all people who don't want to change what's going on, so of course they love what Bennett said.
Tasked with carrying out this policy will be a chief executive officer (CEO) who will work between the policy board and the executive board. The executive board will be made up of a collection of owners and trainers and work just as the NHSC board does today.
WOW, there they are: actually admitting to the fact that things won't change! AMAZING!
Bennett then presented the “boards” that will make up the inside of the house and function within the structure of the HIO. He started with technology and the importance it has with the inspection process. He mentioned digital radiology, thermography and micro-chipping as all important pieces of technology that need to be researched and implemented over time.
WHAT? The USDA VMOs have already implemented this in the shows they go to. The research is already being done. Why do they need to do their own research and implement it "over time?" How about you all step up and start using it NOW. Oh wait, you don't want to do that--then you might actually expose more sore horses. Oops!
Second on the list was a hearing committee. “If you are going to have penalties, there needs to be a method for those accused to have a fair hearing,” Bennett stated. “I believe everyone has the right to a fair and impartial hearing,” he concluded.
I actually agree with this because other horse venues do it: NATRC, USEF, etc. Problem is that we all know it won't be fair and impartial--the hearings will mostly conveniently see the people as innocent and let people continue to get away with soring.
A fourth element would be industry veterinarians who work in the industry on a daily basis and can function like a medical board. They can help with the drugs that are being used and what levels are acceptable and why they are being used as well as provide insight for which foreign substances can be used without harm to the horse. Bennett pointed out that certain groups will never be satisfied with what goes on in the show industry, but respected industry groups will be on board with this plan.
Um, the USDA has already done this: they have deemed that anything except glycerin, mineral oil and petroletum. You can't just choose to go against the HPA, Bennett.
Nope, "certain groups" will never be happy with what you guys do, because those "certain groups" know you are continuing to allow soring! And what groups are you saying are respected? Respected by whom? You? The NHSC? I guarantee you it won't be by the general public, the USEF, or any other group who views the industry as what it truly is: CORRUPT.
The fifth element was a trainers licensing and continuing education program. Continuing education could be anything from business management to scar rule interpretation. With a licensing program trainers that were repeat offenders would see their licenses revoked or some training offered to get those trainers in compliance.
HUH?? How in the hell would business management help with training? And why do you need a licensing program to get licenses revoked? You can choose to do that now if you were serious about ending soring.
Research was another element to the plan. Bennett couldn’t stress enough the importance of research and how it can help with public perception and with allowing the AAEP to continue to work with the industry. “With the AAEP on our side, it will help when we go to the USDA,” stated Bennett.
What kind of research? You don't point out anything here. Plus, how can we trust any research that's done to figure out anything about soring when the sore horse industry is doing the research? And honey, only if you make progress will the AAEP be on your side. You'd better be prepared to do it.
A ninth element was rules/penalties and judges evaluations. Bennett mentioned he didn’t know exactly how to evaluate the judges best but that he had heard many good ideas for this.
And what are they? WHY won't you tell us what ideas you've heard?
Tenth was regional veterinarians. These regional veterinarians would be tasked with overseeing the Designated Qualified Person (DQP) program and the individual performances of those DQPs. He didn’t think it was feasible for every DQP to be a veterinarian but did stress the importance of the consistency of the program and accountability of the program.
Of course you don't want every DQP to be a vet--then they'd expose the industry for what it is. Plus this is one of the ideas in the AAEP White Paper that is guaranteed to help stop soring, so be sure to skirt around this issue as much as possible.
After finishing the presentation Bennett took questions from those in attendance about the proposed plan. Mark Farrar asked “ was there was anything in the white paper that the task force didn’t agree with?” Bennett responded with all of the items in the white paper were valid but not all were practical. He specifically mentioned the urine testing, licensed veterinarians checking all horses and pulling of shoes on performance horses.
NOTE: These are the actions/changes that are guaranteed to determine if a horse is sore or not. So it's pretty damn obvious why they say they're not "practical."
He noted all of the objectives of these could be achieved however through technology or programs within the plan presented.
Sure, they can, if it wouldn't just be business as usual with those programs.\
Farrar also asked, “If we adopt this plan have you talked with the USDA and the AAEP and will they be on board with this plan?” Bennett responded, “Yes and the AAEP will get on board and will be waiting for us to ask for help.”
But we know you won't be asking for help. You know why? Because you'll be glad to keep it so the sore horse continues to win and you continue to get money to line your pockets. You don't need the AAEP to keep the status quo, that's for sure.
Bob Ramsbottom asked, “How will we fund this plan. Will this be left up to the owners to fund this?” Bennett relayed that he didn’t know exactly how to fund the plan and that he had thought a lot about that, “but to be honest, I don’t really know how to fund it.” Frank Neal interjected, “they were tasked with coming up with the plan, it is now the task of the groups within the industry, WHOA, TWHBEA, WHTA, and the Celebration, etc. to fund the execution of this plan.”
I agree with this as well. Neal is absolutely right. You have all decided it's okay to add $1 to each entry fee to implement the USEF drug testing program--how come you can't do that to implement other plans? Because you need to claim that you don't have the money to put into it so you don't ever implement it. Simple way to keep it business as usual.
Overall, this is all just crap. It's just a front to keep things business as usual. None of the serious issues are going to change because they'll just continue to avoid the three main actions that WILL catch sorers (pulling shoes, only using vets as DQPs), not make judges accountable for their choices in the show ring, and not force the industry to pay for these changes. This is pathetic. I can only hope that the USDA will work towards outlawing stacks, heavy shoes, bands, and pads on horses in the show ring in general. That's the only way this can stop--to force the industry to change. It's been 38 years since the HPA became a Federal law--it's obvious they are not going to change their ways on their own.
ARTICLES and NEWS - Walking Horse Report: NHSC Moves Forward with Restructuring
This was forwarded to me via email. Since I think it needs to be read without comments to get the full effect, my next post will include my comments on what happened.
Walking Horse Report
NHSC Moves Forward With Restructuring
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
by Jeffrey Howard
The Walking Horse Owners' Association Board (WHOA) and Walking Horse Trainers' Association's (WHTA) Board of Directors met today to hear the findings of the National Horse Show Commission (NHSC) task force on the restructuring of the NHSC. Dr. John Bennett made the presentation of those findings and had his plan unanimously approved by the NHSC Board of Directors.
Bennett started his presentation by stating the mission of the task force. "We were asked to find a replacement for Lonnie Messick and give recommendations on the restructuring of the HIO to bring integrity and stability," said Bennett.
The new structure will have a policy board at the top of the HIO, comprised of three American Association of Equine Practitioners (AAEP) veterinarians, one humane representative and one attorney. This group will be tasked with setting the policy of the HIO.
Tasked with carrying out this policy will be a chief executive officer (CEO) who will work between the policy board and the executive board. The executive board will be made up of a collection of owners and trainers and work just as the NHSC board does today. The interim CEO was announced today as Dr. Mike Harry. Harry served on both the AAEP task force that released the White Paper and the NHSC task for that made the recommendations for restructuring.
Bennett's proposal followed a theme of building a house where there are rules and those that choose to live there will have to abide by those rules. "To build anyting you have to have a strong foundation and we believe the foundation of this new structure is the White Paper released by the AAEP," said Bennett.
Bennett then presented the "boards" that will make up the inside of the house and function within the structure of the HIO. He started with technology and importance it has with the inspection process. He mentioned digital radiology, thermography and micro-chipping as all important pieces of technology that need to be researched and implemented over time.
Second on the list was a hearing committee. "If you are going to have penalties, there needs to be a method for those accused to have a fair hearing," Bennett stated. "I believe everyone has the right to a fair and impartial hearing," he concluded.
Third he mentioned the importance of the regional breed associations and them having one representative in the HIO. This would be inclusive of regional and national associations.
A fourth element would be industry veterinarians who work in the industry on a daily basis and can function like a medical board. They can help with the drugs that are being used and what levels are acceptable and why they are being used as well as provide insight for which foreign substances can be used without harm to the horse. Bennett pointed out that certain groups will never be satisfied with what goes on in the show industry, but respected industry groups will be on board with this plan.
The fifth element was a trainers licensing and continuing education program. Continuing education could be anything from business management to scar rule interpretation. With a licensing program trainers that were repeat offenders would see their licenses revoked or some training offered to get those trainers in compliance.
Show development was the sixth area. This group would be tasked with developing new ideas to get new shows formed, additional prize monies, additional people in the business, etc. Bennett said he felt the Walking Horse Foundation and Mark Taylor were a perfect fit for this role.
The seventh element was the United States Equestrian Federation drug testing program. This program would be funded by a $1 addition on each entry fee and would be done through random blood testing to start. "In my opinion, our industry does not have a drug problem currently," said Bennett.
Research was another element to the plan. Bennett couldn't stress enough the importance of research and how it can help with public perception and with allowing the AAEP to continue to work with the industry. "With the AAEP on our side, it will help when we go to the USDA," stated Bennett.
A ninth element was rules/penalties and judges evaluations. Bennett mentioned he didn't know exactly how to evaluate the judges best but that he had heard many good ideas for this.
Tenth was regional veterinarians. These regional veterinarians would be tasked with overseeing the Designated Qualifed Person (DQP) program and the individual performances of those DQPs. He didn't think it was feasible for every DQP to be a veterinarian but did stress the importance of the consistency of the program and accountability of the program.
Last was the show steward program. The show steward would be in center ring during the show and assist the judge with rules violations and the excusing of horses that are not presenting the correct image of the Tennessee Walking Horse. This person would have to be a horse person according to the task force but not a walking horse person.
After finishing the presentation, Bennett took questions from those in attendance about the proposed plan. Mark Farrar asked "was there anything in white paper that the task force didn't agree with?" Bennett responded with all of the items in the white paper were valid but not all were practical. He specifically mentioned the urine testing, licensed veterinarians checking all horses, and pulling of shoes on performance horses. He noted that all of the objectives of these could be achieved however through technology or programs within the plan presented.
Farrar also asked, "If we adopt this plan have you talked with the USDA and the AAEP and will they be on board with this plan?" Bennett responded, "Yes and the AAEP will get on board and will be waiting for us to ask for help."
Bob Ramsbottom asked, "How will we fund this plan. Will this be left up to this owners to fund this?" Bennett relayed that he didn't know exactly how to fund the plan and that he had thought a lot about that, "but to be honest, I don't really know how to fund it." Frank Neal interjected, "they were tasked with coming up with the plan, it is now the task of the groups within the industry, WHOA, TWHBEA, WHTA, and the Celebration, etc. to fund the execution of this plan."
Bennett mentioned earlier in the presentation that regional veterinarians would oversee the DQPs at the local shows but that at the bigger shows such as the Celebration, Fun SHow and Trainers' Show that these regional veterinarians would serve as the DQPs. Wink Groover objected, "I don't think the people that check the horses all year long should then not be the people that check at the Celebration. That is a big part of the problem right now. We needto have a strong enough DQP program that if you can't get in at the Celebration then you can't get in at the local show." Bennett agreed with Groover on this and stated the importance of the regional veterinarians in making sure the DQPs are doing their jobs correctly.
A search committee was formed to find the new CEO of the HIO and consisted of Link Webb, Frank Neal, Frank Eichler, Lonnie Messick, Dr. John Henton, and Dr. Tom Vaughn. The interim CEO, Dr. Mike Harry agreed to work for two months in that role. Messick had earlier agreed to work through November to help with the transition to the interim CEO.
At the end of the meeting, Neal commended the WHTA for "their willingness to work toward the future of the industry."
Names of the policy board members were discussed in the executive session of the meeting with nothing finalized at this point, none of the names were released.
As the meeting adjourned and those in attendance left the Miller Coliseum, a rewarded sense of optimism was a common theme. The Walking Horse industry took a big step in addressing the future needs for the welfare of the industry as a whole. Unity has been a common theme in 2008 across the industry, however tough times continued to hamstring the industry. Unity wasn't just talked about, it was practiced today as the owners and trainers within the industry came together and initiated substantive charge.
Walking Horse Report
NHSC Moves Forward With Restructuring
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
by Jeffrey Howard
The Walking Horse Owners' Association Board (WHOA) and Walking Horse Trainers' Association's (WHTA) Board of Directors met today to hear the findings of the National Horse Show Commission (NHSC) task force on the restructuring of the NHSC. Dr. John Bennett made the presentation of those findings and had his plan unanimously approved by the NHSC Board of Directors.
Bennett started his presentation by stating the mission of the task force. "We were asked to find a replacement for Lonnie Messick and give recommendations on the restructuring of the HIO to bring integrity and stability," said Bennett.
The new structure will have a policy board at the top of the HIO, comprised of three American Association of Equine Practitioners (AAEP) veterinarians, one humane representative and one attorney. This group will be tasked with setting the policy of the HIO.
Tasked with carrying out this policy will be a chief executive officer (CEO) who will work between the policy board and the executive board. The executive board will be made up of a collection of owners and trainers and work just as the NHSC board does today. The interim CEO was announced today as Dr. Mike Harry. Harry served on both the AAEP task force that released the White Paper and the NHSC task for that made the recommendations for restructuring.
Bennett's proposal followed a theme of building a house where there are rules and those that choose to live there will have to abide by those rules. "To build anyting you have to have a strong foundation and we believe the foundation of this new structure is the White Paper released by the AAEP," said Bennett.
Bennett then presented the "boards" that will make up the inside of the house and function within the structure of the HIO. He started with technology and importance it has with the inspection process. He mentioned digital radiology, thermography and micro-chipping as all important pieces of technology that need to be researched and implemented over time.
Second on the list was a hearing committee. "If you are going to have penalties, there needs to be a method for those accused to have a fair hearing," Bennett stated. "I believe everyone has the right to a fair and impartial hearing," he concluded.
Third he mentioned the importance of the regional breed associations and them having one representative in the HIO. This would be inclusive of regional and national associations.
A fourth element would be industry veterinarians who work in the industry on a daily basis and can function like a medical board. They can help with the drugs that are being used and what levels are acceptable and why they are being used as well as provide insight for which foreign substances can be used without harm to the horse. Bennett pointed out that certain groups will never be satisfied with what goes on in the show industry, but respected industry groups will be on board with this plan.
The fifth element was a trainers licensing and continuing education program. Continuing education could be anything from business management to scar rule interpretation. With a licensing program trainers that were repeat offenders would see their licenses revoked or some training offered to get those trainers in compliance.
Show development was the sixth area. This group would be tasked with developing new ideas to get new shows formed, additional prize monies, additional people in the business, etc. Bennett said he felt the Walking Horse Foundation and Mark Taylor were a perfect fit for this role.
The seventh element was the United States Equestrian Federation drug testing program. This program would be funded by a $1 addition on each entry fee and would be done through random blood testing to start. "In my opinion, our industry does not have a drug problem currently," said Bennett.
Research was another element to the plan. Bennett couldn't stress enough the importance of research and how it can help with public perception and with allowing the AAEP to continue to work with the industry. "With the AAEP on our side, it will help when we go to the USDA," stated Bennett.
A ninth element was rules/penalties and judges evaluations. Bennett mentioned he didn't know exactly how to evaluate the judges best but that he had heard many good ideas for this.
Tenth was regional veterinarians. These regional veterinarians would be tasked with overseeing the Designated Qualifed Person (DQP) program and the individual performances of those DQPs. He didn't think it was feasible for every DQP to be a veterinarian but did stress the importance of the consistency of the program and accountability of the program.
Last was the show steward program. The show steward would be in center ring during the show and assist the judge with rules violations and the excusing of horses that are not presenting the correct image of the Tennessee Walking Horse. This person would have to be a horse person according to the task force but not a walking horse person.
After finishing the presentation, Bennett took questions from those in attendance about the proposed plan. Mark Farrar asked "was there anything in white paper that the task force didn't agree with?" Bennett responded with all of the items in the white paper were valid but not all were practical. He specifically mentioned the urine testing, licensed veterinarians checking all horses, and pulling of shoes on performance horses. He noted that all of the objectives of these could be achieved however through technology or programs within the plan presented.
Farrar also asked, "If we adopt this plan have you talked with the USDA and the AAEP and will they be on board with this plan?" Bennett responded, "Yes and the AAEP will get on board and will be waiting for us to ask for help."
Bob Ramsbottom asked, "How will we fund this plan. Will this be left up to this owners to fund this?" Bennett relayed that he didn't know exactly how to fund the plan and that he had thought a lot about that, "but to be honest, I don't really know how to fund it." Frank Neal interjected, "they were tasked with coming up with the plan, it is now the task of the groups within the industry, WHOA, TWHBEA, WHTA, and the Celebration, etc. to fund the execution of this plan."
Bennett mentioned earlier in the presentation that regional veterinarians would oversee the DQPs at the local shows but that at the bigger shows such as the Celebration, Fun SHow and Trainers' Show that these regional veterinarians would serve as the DQPs. Wink Groover objected, "I don't think the people that check the horses all year long should then not be the people that check at the Celebration. That is a big part of the problem right now. We needto have a strong enough DQP program that if you can't get in at the Celebration then you can't get in at the local show." Bennett agreed with Groover on this and stated the importance of the regional veterinarians in making sure the DQPs are doing their jobs correctly.
A search committee was formed to find the new CEO of the HIO and consisted of Link Webb, Frank Neal, Frank Eichler, Lonnie Messick, Dr. John Henton, and Dr. Tom Vaughn. The interim CEO, Dr. Mike Harry agreed to work for two months in that role. Messick had earlier agreed to work through November to help with the transition to the interim CEO.
At the end of the meeting, Neal commended the WHTA for "their willingness to work toward the future of the industry."
Names of the policy board members were discussed in the executive session of the meeting with nothing finalized at this point, none of the names were released.
As the meeting adjourned and those in attendance left the Miller Coliseum, a rewarded sense of optimism was a common theme. The Walking Horse industry took a big step in addressing the future needs for the welfare of the industry as a whole. Unity has been a common theme in 2008 across the industry, however tough times continued to hamstring the industry. Unity wasn't just talked about, it was practiced today as the owners and trainers within the industry came together and initiated substantive charge.
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
NEWS and ARTICLES - The KHRC approves an emergency regulation concerning the HPA
VICTORY! THANK YOU to the KHRC for stepping up to the plate on this one! And congratulations to ALL who exposed KWHA for what they truly are! Click here for the article.
Important quotes from the article:
The commission approved an emergency regulation to make those with Horse Protection Act violations of any kind ineligible for money from the state fund, which is designed to encourage horse breeding in Kentucky.
"With this action, the KHRC has again demonstrated its committment to the humane treatment of horses," said Lisa Underwood, KHRC executive director, in a news release. "The commission clearly recognizes that soring is an inhumane practice that should not be tolerated or rewarded."
The new rule must go through the normal regulatory process but, if approved, could retroactively apply to those who received money from the 2006 and 2007 years.
Jamie Eads, director of the breeders' incentive funds, said her investigation of previous check recipients has uncovered 15 who had HPA violations, at least one of which was for soring. This counters claims made by the Kentucky Walking Horse Association and its incentive fund, which previously stated to the commission that no recipients had violations.
Important quotes from the article:
The commission approved an emergency regulation to make those with Horse Protection Act violations of any kind ineligible for money from the state fund, which is designed to encourage horse breeding in Kentucky.
"With this action, the KHRC has again demonstrated its committment to the humane treatment of horses," said Lisa Underwood, KHRC executive director, in a news release. "The commission clearly recognizes that soring is an inhumane practice that should not be tolerated or rewarded."
The new rule must go through the normal regulatory process but, if approved, could retroactively apply to those who received money from the 2006 and 2007 years.
Jamie Eads, director of the breeders' incentive funds, said her investigation of previous check recipients has uncovered 15 who had HPA violations, at least one of which was for soring. This counters claims made by the Kentucky Walking Horse Association and its incentive fund, which previously stated to the commission that no recipients had violations.
Monday, October 27, 2008
NEWS - Video: See it Through My Eyes
Here's a video that was put together by two girls in Girl Scouts. I commend these two young women for stepping up and exposing this information. I hope that young adults of their age who are currently involved in soring watch this video and have a change of heart. If the next generation steps up and says NO to soring, then we can hope to for a bright future for the TWH.
Click here for the video.
Click here for the video.
Thursday, October 23, 2008
ARTICLES - A simple nibble & It all started with a look: the life of a sored horse
This is what you can expect to experience at a Big Lick barn, and what every sore horse experiences on a daily basis. This blog is dead on as to what happens to these animals, and shows us why it's so important for this abuse to stop. NO ONE can tell me that Big Lick horses are the most well cared for breed in the world. NO. ONE.
Harper's owner is also a member of the forum at One Horse At A Time, and she has been talking about the progress with Harper. Come join the forum to learn more about how this gorgeous mare is being rehabilitated.
Harper's owner is also a member of the forum at One Horse At A Time, and she has been talking about the progress with Harper. Come join the forum to learn more about how this gorgeous mare is being rehabilitated.
Thursday, October 9, 2008
THOUGHTS - RUMOR CONTROL Concerning NWHA
Okay, folks, I need to do some rumor control.
I heard a rumor that some tickets were handed out at the NWHA Nationals, so I did some digging. This is what I've found out.
One owner and their trainer were ticketed for two separate horses, one horse for bilateral and one horse for one foot. The horses were ticketed based on their reaction to palpation. A different owner was ticketed for having tungsten shoes on their horse.* That's just low--kudos to the DQP who caught that person in trying to get tungsten shoes past them.
I know the owner who was ticketed for two horses. Honestly, I believe her horses are sound. The thing is that the owner is very upset and claims that NWHA is "out to get" them and "set them up" because they were winning. This person seems to believe that the DQP did not perform a proper inspection and they palpated way too hard. The problem is that an algometry study was done in Feb 2008 to address this particular claim, which is common among the sore horse industry--they say that the DQPs press too hard to force their horses to react (click here for the presentation of the study). This study found that the average pressure a DQP or VMO is required to use--where it blanches the nail and flattens the thumb--is about 0.5 lbs. The algometry study used a measuring device that presses against the horse's legs and measures how many lbs are being exherted. The horse was fine with the pressure up to about 40 to 50 lbs, some as high as 70 lbs. This shows that it is physically impossible for a person, when using their thumb, to exert enough pressure on the horse to make it react unless the horse has a pre-existing condition, such as chemical soring OR an injury that isn't related to soring.
I myself have tried this on my sound horses. I have pressed as hard as I can with the fat of my thumb. I have even dug my nail in, which is what the sore horse industry is saying the USDA VMOs are doing when they inspect their horses. I have NEVER had an adverse reaction in my horses.
MY THOUGHTS: Some trainers use rollers or heavy chains on a horse to condition them to carrying weight. Personally, I have no problem with this--the horses are NOT sore. When you add some weight to the horse's legs, it's similar to cyclists adding weight to their shoes when they are training. They do this so when the compete without the weight, they are conditioned for the weight, so without it they pedal faster and harder. If you use rollers and other weighted devices properly, you won't hurt the horse. I was taught to only ride in them for about 15 minutes at at time to avoid this and hair loss. I have used them myself, before I knew what soring was and before I found out that we can get the gait naturally and gimmicks aren't necessary. I don't use them myself anymore, but I don't really care if others use them, as long as the horse is not in any pain.
However, I have accidentally bruised a horse when I kept the rollers on for too long. I didn't know she was bruised until I was putting linament on her after we rode to loosen her muscles, and when I went over her pasterns she picked up her feet, which she hadn't done before. When I pressed on the area she reacted, so I'm sure she was bruised. That was MY fault for leaving the rollers on for too long.
So, my speculation is that it's possible that the trainer kept rollers or heavy chains on the horses for too long and they developed bruises. The reason I think this is because if it were something as simple as the horse bonking his pastern as he got in the trailer or some kind of pasture injury, it wouldn't be on two different horses and on both legs of one of the horses. I believe that the person who was ticketed needs to do some work with their trainer to see what he/she was doing to train the horses and if that could have contributed.
>Overall, I would like for everyone to keep in mind that this is a positive incident for NWHA. First, they caught a person who was obviously trying to cheat. Second, they have a no-tolerance policy, and they must enforce it no matter what. If they're lenient for one person, then they have to do it for everyone.
I support the NWHA DQPs decision and will continue to do so.
-------
*Tungsten is a heavier metal than steel. Tungsten horseshoes have the same appearance as regular steel shoes, but they weigh considerably more and are not allowed per the weight requirements for most show venues. Using tungsten shoes creates an unfair advantage as the horse has to step higher to carry the weight, and therefore he will have more lift and be a fancier mount in the show ring. Tungsten shoes do not sore a horse--they are just beyond the regulations for the amount of weight allowed to be put on a horse's feet.
From the 2005 WHOA Convention News (click here for the article): "Regular steel shoes weigh a little less than half the weight of tungsten shoes of the same measurement. A pair of tungsten shoes generally costs around $1500 and they must be made specifically for the horse because tungsten cannot be re-shaped. Shoes that are partially tungsten cost about $750 a pair and can undergo a small degree of re-shaping."
I heard a rumor that some tickets were handed out at the NWHA Nationals, so I did some digging. This is what I've found out.
One owner and their trainer were ticketed for two separate horses, one horse for bilateral and one horse for one foot. The horses were ticketed based on their reaction to palpation. A different owner was ticketed for having tungsten shoes on their horse.* That's just low--kudos to the DQP who caught that person in trying to get tungsten shoes past them.
I know the owner who was ticketed for two horses. Honestly, I believe her horses are sound. The thing is that the owner is very upset and claims that NWHA is "out to get" them and "set them up" because they were winning. This person seems to believe that the DQP did not perform a proper inspection and they palpated way too hard. The problem is that an algometry study was done in Feb 2008 to address this particular claim, which is common among the sore horse industry--they say that the DQPs press too hard to force their horses to react (click here for the presentation of the study). This study found that the average pressure a DQP or VMO is required to use--where it blanches the nail and flattens the thumb--is about 0.5 lbs. The algometry study used a measuring device that presses against the horse's legs and measures how many lbs are being exherted. The horse was fine with the pressure up to about 40 to 50 lbs, some as high as 70 lbs. This shows that it is physically impossible for a person, when using their thumb, to exert enough pressure on the horse to make it react unless the horse has a pre-existing condition, such as chemical soring OR an injury that isn't related to soring.
I myself have tried this on my sound horses. I have pressed as hard as I can with the fat of my thumb. I have even dug my nail in, which is what the sore horse industry is saying the USDA VMOs are doing when they inspect their horses. I have NEVER had an adverse reaction in my horses.
MY THOUGHTS: Some trainers use rollers or heavy chains on a horse to condition them to carrying weight. Personally, I have no problem with this--the horses are NOT sore. When you add some weight to the horse's legs, it's similar to cyclists adding weight to their shoes when they are training. They do this so when the compete without the weight, they are conditioned for the weight, so without it they pedal faster and harder. If you use rollers and other weighted devices properly, you won't hurt the horse. I was taught to only ride in them for about 15 minutes at at time to avoid this and hair loss. I have used them myself, before I knew what soring was and before I found out that we can get the gait naturally and gimmicks aren't necessary. I don't use them myself anymore, but I don't really care if others use them, as long as the horse is not in any pain.
However, I have accidentally bruised a horse when I kept the rollers on for too long. I didn't know she was bruised until I was putting linament on her after we rode to loosen her muscles, and when I went over her pasterns she picked up her feet, which she hadn't done before. When I pressed on the area she reacted, so I'm sure she was bruised. That was MY fault for leaving the rollers on for too long.
So, my speculation is that it's possible that the trainer kept rollers or heavy chains on the horses for too long and they developed bruises. The reason I think this is because if it were something as simple as the horse bonking his pastern as he got in the trailer or some kind of pasture injury, it wouldn't be on two different horses and on both legs of one of the horses. I believe that the person who was ticketed needs to do some work with their trainer to see what he/she was doing to train the horses and if that could have contributed.
>Overall, I would like for everyone to keep in mind that this is a positive incident for NWHA. First, they caught a person who was obviously trying to cheat. Second, they have a no-tolerance policy, and they must enforce it no matter what. If they're lenient for one person, then they have to do it for everyone.
I support the NWHA DQPs decision and will continue to do so.
-------
*Tungsten is a heavier metal than steel. Tungsten horseshoes have the same appearance as regular steel shoes, but they weigh considerably more and are not allowed per the weight requirements for most show venues. Using tungsten shoes creates an unfair advantage as the horse has to step higher to carry the weight, and therefore he will have more lift and be a fancier mount in the show ring. Tungsten shoes do not sore a horse--they are just beyond the regulations for the amount of weight allowed to be put on a horse's feet.
From the 2005 WHOA Convention News (click here for the article): "Regular steel shoes weigh a little less than half the weight of tungsten shoes of the same measurement. A pair of tungsten shoes generally costs around $1500 and they must be made specifically for the horse because tungsten cannot be re-shaped. Shoes that are partially tungsten cost about $750 a pair and can undergo a small degree of re-shaping."
Thursday, October 2, 2008
NEWS and ARTICLE - KY State Regulators Investigate Breeder Incentive Recipient KWHA
Click here for the article. Man, I cannot WAIT to see the results of this! Let's hope they stop giving the money to KWHA!
NEWS - HSUS invited to the NWHA Nationals
Here's a link to an article about the HSUS being invited to the NWHA Nationals. This is very exciting as Keith Dane, the president of HSUS, used to be the president of FOSH and is a sound horse owner and advocate by far.
The HSUS also sponsored the first annual NWHA Youth Leadership Conference and have posted a $10,000 reward to anyone who gives evidence that leads to the arrest and conviction of anyone who currently sores their horses.
The HSUS also sponsored the first annual NWHA Youth Leadership Conference and have posted a $10,000 reward to anyone who gives evidence that leads to the arrest and conviction of anyone who currently sores their horses.
Wednesday, October 1, 2008
ARTICLES - Pre-HPA Outrage
These are amazing finds. I ran across the first article on a comment on the blog Shame in the Horse Show Ring. The articles were in Sports Illustrated. (Sometimes I forget that they do horse stuff, too! What if they had a horse swimsuit issue...? Never mind.)
This is information that is pre-HPA. Note the outrage of the writers. Here is some real truths about how the horses were in the ring just a few decades ago. They were calling for something to be done then, and yet it's still just as bad today....
Woe for Walkers, 23 July 1956
The Torture Must End, 11 January 1960
Hot Heads Over Hot Feet, 13 June 1960
Score Card - Sore Horses, 2 February 1970
This is information that is pre-HPA. Note the outrage of the writers. Here is some real truths about how the horses were in the ring just a few decades ago. They were calling for something to be done then, and yet it's still just as bad today....
Woe for Walkers, 23 July 1956
The Torture Must End, 11 January 1960
Hot Heads Over Hot Feet, 13 June 1960
Score Card - Sore Horses, 2 February 1970
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)